Monday 30 September 2019

The Buddha Was Here

by Andrea Miller

The National Museum in New Delhi doesn’t usually welcome visitors until 10 a.m., but on the first morning of the 2018 International Buddhist Conclave, they open their doors early for us. This, the sixth edition of the conclave, is attended by nearly three hundred people from twenty-nine countries. We are journalists and monastics, travel agents and scholars. We are Buddhists from many traditions and non-Buddhists. Our purpose is to connect with each other and explore the potential of Buddhist pilgrimage in India.

As I’m filing through security, I have no idea what treasures the National Museum houses. So as far as I know, this museum visit doesn’t have a direct connection to the conclave’s mission. It’s just a nice add-on for those of us who are interested. And I am interested — in everything. This is my first time in India, a place I have always longed to visit.

I marvel at an elegant bronze figurine of a dancer from the Indus Valley, circa 2500 BCE. I laugh when Shantum Seth, an Indian dharma teacher in Thich Nhat Hanh’s Plum Village tradition, quips that the ancient dinnerware on display looks as if it could have come from Ikea. (He’s right!) But most memorable of all, I feel a quiet thrill when I come to the Buddhist artefacts and, though I’m being hurried along, I pause for as long as I can in front of a depiction of the Buddha’s birth. As was the artistic custom in the early centuries of Buddhism, the Buddha himself is not shown — just his footprints.

Along with the other delegates, I’m ushered into a room that’s been prepared for us for meditation and I quietly take a seat on the floor. We sit facing an intricate pavilion, gleaming with gold, that was crafted from teak by Thai artists. This pavilion is roped off and behind glass, and I don’t know what it holds until someone whispers in my ear: they’re bone fragments from the Buddha.

But are they really? The Buddha died so long ago. How can we know that these bits of skull belonged to him and not to someone else? This is a valid question. Yet as Shantum Seth rings the bell and a clutch of Theravadin monks in saffron robes begins to drone their Pali chants, it’s not a question that concerns me. What’s touching me is the fact that the Buddha had bones — and flesh — at all.

So often we talk about the Buddha as if he were a figure from mythology, not a human being like you and me. Generation after generation, for thousands of years, we’ve revered his wisdom so much that in our imagination he has become more of a deity than a person, and his life story has been embellished with fantastical flourishes — the stuff of legends. Maybe it’s because we want there to be someone who is more than human to save us. Maybe it’s because it’s so hard to grasp a time like 500 BCE, which is around when the Buddha lived. It sounds so far in the past that maybe it was never.

But now I’m meditating in front of ancient bone and, for a moment, it feels as if the Buddha has reached through the centuries and tapped me on the shoulder. I was real, he seems to say. I was here.

This is how the story goes. Twenty-six centuries ago, in the foothills of the Himalayas, Queen Mahamaya dreamed of a white elephant with a lotus in its trunk. The elephant circled her three times and then entered her womb. Since elephants were considered a symbol of greatness, this dream was taken as a sign that Mahamaya would have an extraordinary child.

In those days it was customary for a woman to return to her parents’ house to give birth. So when Mahamaya felt the time had come, she set out for her ancestral home. Along the way they stopped to rest in Lumbini, a garden in what is now Nepal, and there she delivered her child. It is said that heavenly beings showered down flower petals and the newborn — shining like the sun — took seven paces in each direction and wherever he stepped, a lotus sprang up.

It was prophesied that the boy, named Siddhartha, would grow up to become either a great king or a great spiritual leader. His father — hoping that Siddhartha would dedicate himself to the political realm — tried to guide him in that direction by sheltering Siddhartha within the luxurious confines of his palaces. When Siddhartha was sixteen years old, he married Yasodhara, who was also of his clan, and the couple eventually had a son.

But then, at age twenty-nine, Siddhartha got a glimpse of the troubled world his father had protected him from. Out driving with his charioteer, he saw — for the very first time — old age, disease, and death, and he learned that this degeneration was the inescapable human condition. The prince was shocked. How could everyone just go about their lives, seeking silly pleasures, as if this shadow weren’t hanging over them?

While mired in this thought, Siddhartha saw a holy man. Dressed simply, this man had such a peaceful look on his face that Siddhartha knew what he needed to do. In the middle of the night he slipped away, leaving his family and royal life behind. This is how he took his first step on the spiritual path.

Siddhartha found a holy man and mastered his teachings; then he found another and mastered his. Yet Siddhartha still felt that something was missing in his understanding. So, following the suggestion of the great Jain teacher Mahavira, he decided to follow the path of asceticism. Siddhartha’s approach was extreme and left him skeletal and weak. Rigidly practising meditation, he held his breath for long, dangerous periods of time and each day ate only what fit into the hollow of his palm.

Eventually, Siddhartha realised that this self-mortification was going to kill him, not lead him to enlightenment. What he actually needed to advance spiritually was a middle way, neither worldly indulgence nor harsh austerities. On Siddhartha’s thirty-fifth birthday, he broke his fast when a young village woman named Sujata made him an offering: a bowl of sweetened rice cooked in milk.

Sujata’s gift gave Siddhartha the strength to cross the Nairanjana River, and on the other side, on a sandy bank, he came to a large tree with heart-shaped leaves. Siddhartha sat beneath it and, in full lotus facing east, vowed that he’d stay there until he reached enlightenment. This type of tree became known as a ficus religiosa — a Bodhi tree.

Since I was a kid, I’ve always thought of large trees as generous, stable grandfathers, quietly offering shade and support. But the tree the Buddha sat under was more like an old teacher — kind and venerable. I imagine Siddhartha contemplating the heart-shaped leaves and seeing in them the sunshine and rain, the earth and clouds, and in that way, I imagine the tree teaching him dependent arising: if this exists, that exists; if this ceases to exist, that also ceases to exist.

Though the original Bodhi tree is long gone, its place has been taken by what’s believed to be a direct descendent. In the Buddha’s time, the tree was rooted in a rural setting, but over the centuries a town by the name of Bodhgaya has grown up around it. Bodhgaya is located in the modern Indian state of Bihar — the poorest in India — and the nearest airport is in Gaya, intense and busy like all Indian cities.

I arrive on a chartered flight with the other delegates of the International Buddhist Conclave, which is sponsored by the government of India. We’re given an exuberant, flower-filled welcome and herded onto eight buses festooned with marigold garlands, long stemmed red roses, and ribbons. Driving to Bodhgaya, the buses stick together as if they are a train. A police escort leads us, and children wave as we pass by.

Finally, we get to the site of the Buddha’s awakening, and there, silhouetted against the sky, is the Mahabodhi temple, a tall, graceful pyramid rising from a square platform. Everywhere I look people are meditating. They’re monastic and lay; in robes and in jeans; doing traditional practice or their own thing. One man has his eyes covered and a bottle of water balanced in each hand, as if they were Chinese meditation balls. There’s also the odd stray dog.

Bodhgaya is the most important pilgrimage site in the Buddhist world, and it’s believed that even in the Buddha’s time there was a shrine here. At first, the Bodhi tree was marked simply by a two-story wooden structure and stone throne. Then in the third century, Ashoka, the Mauryan king who was instrumental in spreading Buddhism in India, ordered the construction of a commemorative temple. Mahabodhi was originally built in the sixth century and over the years has been destroyed and rebuilt several times.

Along with the rest of the delegates, I take my place under the Bodhi tree, which is right beside the temple. Sitting on oriental rugs that have been laid out for us, we face an altar laden with dragon fruit, pomegranates, pink roses, and a statue of the Buddha. A Theravadin monk lights a lamp, and the chanting begins, then builds, and finally stops. Slowly, I let go of my rushing and grasping and find my breath.

Shantum Seth, who sits facing me and the other delegates, rings a bell. “Our teacher, the Buddha, sat under the Bodhi tree for forty-nine days and nights and then continued to be with the Bodhi tree for another forty-nine days,” he says. “So, we look at the Bodhi tree as our spiritual ancestor and we sit with her in the same way the Buddha did — in the present moment.”

Seth holds a yellow Bodhi leaf in his hand and glances down at it occasionally. Focusing on our breath, he continues, our body and mind come together. Often our body is here but our mind is elsewhere. Meditation trains the mind to come back to the present and gives us a way to look more deeply into what’s going on both inside of us and outside.

Seth rings the bell again and guides us to straighten our backs, relax our shoulders, and feel the gentle rise and fall of our bellies. He has a soothing voice, which eventually dissolves into silence. Now, we are hundreds of people, all together, listening to nothing but our breathing and the chorus of birds calling from the branches above our heads.

Later, I talk about our experience under the Bodhi tree with one of the non-Buddhist delegates, a journalist from Poland. Something about it touched her so deeply, she says, that it brought tears to her eyes. It was like she could feel the collective energy of generation after generation of people coming to this spot and finding stillness and quiet. It didn’t matter that she wasn’t a Buddhist.

Shantum Seth, in addition to being a dharma teacher, is also a longtime leader of Buddhist pilgrimage tours with his company Buddhapath. Under the Bodhi tree, he says, people often find they have a deep sense of concentration and gratitude. “There are magical memories you can have,” he continues. “You’re sitting there meditating and then maybe a leaf falls onto your lap. You can take that leaf with you to your meditation space back home and put it on your alter to be reminded of this beautiful space where the Buddha — and you — practised.”

Siddhartha took his seat under the Bodhi tree on a full moon just before the rainy season. As our train of buses pulls away from Bodhgaya, I understand a little more about what it must have been like for him. We were also there when the moon was a perfect circle. While I was sitting under the Bodhi tree, a few cooling raindrops fell on my back, and they felt like a gift.

After the Buddha achieved enlightenment, he pondered how he could share his realisations with others. The truth he had realised was difficult to grasp and ran hard against the grain of human desires. Most people, the Buddha knew, would turn away from his teachings, but he would try to teach those who could truly listen and understand.

The Buddha contemplated who he should teach first. He thought of the two holy men he’d studied with, but he knew they had passed away. Then he thought of the five men he’d practised asceticism with. They’d shunned him when he started to practice the middle way, but he knew they were sincere seekers and might listen.

The five ascetics were residing in a park where deer roamed freely, in a place now called Sarnath, located in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh. So, taking his leave of the Bodhi tree, the Buddha walked more than 160 miles to find his old companions. When they saw him coming, they resolved to ignore him, but there was something new and remarkable about his bearing and, despite themselves, they were drawn to him.

This, says Shantum Seth, is when “the Buddha became the buddhadharma.” On that day in Deer Park, the Buddha taught for the very first time. In this, his first sermon, he taught the four noble truths, and in doing so laid the foundation of the world religion we know today as Buddhism. He taught the truths of suffering, the cause of suffering, the end of suffering, and the path.

An ascetic named Kaundinya was the first to realise the truth of the Buddha’s teachings. Then soon after, the other four ascetics in the Deer Park came to the same realisation. They were the first Buddhist monks, and the Buddhist sangha — the world’s oldest continuous human institution — was born.

The Buddha went on to teach for forty-five years. He and his growing number of followers crisscrossed the plains of northern India, going everywhere on foot. He often returned to Sarnath and the surrounding area.

Today, the most iconic feature of Sarnath is the massive Dhamek Stupa, built in 500 CE. Stupas are Buddhist mound-like structures that often contain relics, but Dhamek is solid and relic-less. Other notable sites in this historical city include additional stupas and the Archaeological Museum Sarnath, which houses such antiquities as a lustrously polished sculpture of four lions, each facing a different direction. These four united felines were crafted under the auspices of King Ashoka and originally topped a pillar in Sarnath. Today they’re recognised around the world as the official symbol of the Republic of India.

As I wander Sarnath, I linger near the Dhamek Stupa, feeling small next to its girth of more than ninety feet. From a distance, it looks unornamented but up close I can see that it’s delicately chiselled with floral and geometric designs, human figures, and even geese. Geese, I’m told, symbolise the sangha because they’re birds that live in community, taking turns leading and caring for each other. This reminds me of two Theravadin monastics — one elderly, one young — who are participating in the conclave. The young monk takes such tender care of his teacher.

Near the Dhamek Stupa stands the Mulagandhakuti Vihara, a temple established in 1931 with an interesting — and international — backstory. In 1891, Anagarika Dharmapala, a Buddhist revivalist from Ceylon, went on pilgrimage to India. At that time, the Mahabodhi Temple had recently been restored but — since Buddhism was no longer practised in India — the temple had been converted into a place of worship of the Hindu deity Shiva.

When Dharmapala saw this, he resolved to help bring Buddhism back to India and, as part of his efforts, he spoke about Buddhism at the 1893 Parliament of the World’s Religions in Chicago. On the way back, his ship docked in Hawaii and, there, Mary Foster, a friend of a friend, went to meet him. She was a wealthy American woman in emotional turmoil, and Dharmapala consoled her with Buddhist teachings. After that, Foster gave him a substantial donation, and he used that money to build Mulagandhakuti Vihara, marking where the Buddha meditated during his first  rainy season retreat after awakening.

On the Mulagandhakuti grounds, there is a tree that, like the one in Bodhgaya, is said to be a descendent of the original Bodhi tree. Its spreading branches are said to symbolise the new growth of Buddhism in India. The temple exterior is embellished with spires, and the interior is graced by a golden statue of the Buddha and frescos depicting his life that were poignantly painted in soft hues by a Japanese artist. There, in front of me on the wall, is an image of the newly born Siddhartha taking his first steps. And there he is under the Bodhi tree, with Sujata presenting him with her food offering. Finally, there he is stretched out on his side in death — his final resting posture.

According to the Mahaparinirvana Sutra, the Buddha said it is of great benefit for practitioners to go on pilgrimage to the four places associated with the most pivotal moments in his life: his birth, his enlightenment, his first teaching, and his death. But bear in mind that the point of pilgrimage isn’t just veneration. As Shantum Seth explains, it “teaches us a healthy disregard for comfort. It helps us look at our own mind in an unhabituated way, and teaches patience and humility. You get to know yourself better.”

When we go to these Buddhist pilgrimage sites, we gain new insight into the Buddha’s teachings because we have a deeper understanding of his life and circumstances. Despite all the cars, cellphones, and skyscrapers, you can still connect with the India the Buddha lived in 2,600 years ago. Village life is cut from same ancient cloth, and you can meet a modern-day Sujata, serving something sweet and energising. The rivers and caves you read about in the sutras are still there, too. Farmers still plough their fields behind water buffalo the same way they did in the Buddha’s time. On pilgrimage, says Seth, “The Buddha’s story becomes real. You’re seeing the whole context of his life. You’re breathing the same air he did.”

In the Mulagandhakuti temple, I take another long look at the fresco of the Buddha stretched out in death. He died from food poisoning in Kushinagar, in present-day Uttar Pradesh. He was in his eighties and, like every other human being, he’d experienced various mundane ailments his whole life. Sickness, age, fatigue, death — these are the realities of a human body, even the body of the Buddha.

Now, in this place where the Buddha is said to have spent a rainy season meditating, I feel as if he just whispered in my ear, then slipped out the temple door. He seemed to say to me that although he was not eternal, his teachings are, and the beautiful, inspiring thing about his being human is that it means there’s hope for all of us. We — just like the Buddha — have the potential to awaken.

I stand in front of the golden Buddha at the altar and light a candle. Then, following my breath, I watch the flame dance and burn.


The Five Protections Against Sorrow


In Buddhism it is taught that everything that happens to us, good or bad, is the result of our previous actions — it is our karma. Refraining from five kinds of unskilful action will result in peace of mind and true happiness. In order to be protected against sorrow, therefore, one should:

* refrain from harming anything;
* refrain from taking that which is not freely given;
* refrain from all forms of immorality or any action which is subject to blame;
* refrain from speaking falsely, harshly, or unkindly;
* refrain from indulging in anything which causes the mind to lose its natural clarity, such as drugs or alcohol.

By refraining from these unskilful actions, one will experience the peace and happiness of one’s true nature, one’s Buddha-nature.

The Great Way starts beneath one’s feet.


Sunday 29 September 2019

因果与修行

如瑞法师

别忽略了因果

我们在生活当中最容易体验到的要算身体生病,而从生病当中也可以来锻炼自己。不舒服的时候,一般人可能最先想的是看医生,但慢慢地要学会在自己身上观照,来看因果找出原因,从根本上来对治。

我经常都是用这种方法来面对病苦的。在我上高中的时候,学校组织一场比赛,比赛下来,我们团队输了,我很生气。争吵完以后,急急忙忙去吃饭,结果因此得了个急性阑尾炎。本来阑尾炎只要到医院做个小手术就可以治好,但因为种种的缘,没有及时做手术,最后导致阑尾脓肿。那时还是没太重视,也没管它。就这样,出了家以后,直到现在几十年了,阑尾老是隐隐地疼痛。我想,同样一个阑尾炎,很小的事情,为什么发生在自己身上就产生了这样的痛苦,而且这种痛苦一直伴随着自己?

究其我这一生,有没有做过杀生害命的事情?我把从记事以来能回想起来的事情,一一列出来了写在纸上,才发现原来在还不懂事的时候,杀了很多生。

我二三岁就离开父母,住到外婆家。外婆家前面有一条小河,我天天守在河边玩。外婆他们不信佛,也不懂,老人家经常让我去小河里捞蝌蚪喂鸡,常常一天要捞回来好多。当把那些蝌蚪扔到地上的时候,许多鸡便争先恐后来啄食,蝌蚪的肚子被啄破,马上能看到肚里流出来东西……现在回想起来,真是惨不忍睹!

想一想,自己因无知残害了多少生命!在没有做检点的时候就认为:哎呀,我实在太幸运,能出生在一个佛教徒的家庭,可以说从小没有做过什么坏事,连吃肉都是很少。但通过反省,才发现自己杀业这么重!若不是佛菩萨加被,以及在大众僧当中自己消了很多很多的业,又何止这一点点的痛苦?

当我找到了原因之后,除了看医生之外,只有好好地忏悔。当然,忏悔的方法很多,比如说拜佛诵经,或者打坐观想佛菩萨的慈光照耀我,帮我消除业障。甚至我会去用沟通的方法,也就是用心和它们商量:无数的生命,我在无意当中伤害了你们,请你们原谅我!现在我知道了自己的错误,能不能给我一个忏悔的机会?这样,既抒发了自己内心的愧疚,而且对众生也能好言相劝,让它放自己一马。慢慢地,病苦减轻了许多。

会修行的人走到哪里都能修

昨天有位同学对我诉苦说,在做事当中很烦恼,想出去一段时间。我对她说:“你为什么会烦恼呢?因为你每天都是在为“我”着想,认为每天所得到的,都不是你所需要的。总觉得除此之外,另外还有一个成佛的方法,所以总想再求一个什么法来修。但是你已经求了那么多的法,好好修了吗?”

以前有位老婆婆想求法求不到,去问邻居。邻居骗她说:“你就念‘南无桂圆荔枝核’,这就是高深的大法。”老婆婆非常高兴,以为这是佛菩萨的名号,所以每天很精进地念“南无桂圆荔枝核”。

一次她儿子出海乘船遇难,在千钧一发之际,想不到一大片的桂圆荔枝核把他浮起来飘到岸上。其他的同伴都淹死了,而他平安无事。她儿子逢人就说:“这全仗我妈在家天天念佛,我才得救了!”

还有一个人,念观音菩萨六字大明咒,把“嗡嘛尼叭弥吽”,念成“嗡嘛尼叭弥牛”。因为念得很有功夫,一年闹饥荒,居然能把石头变成芋头来吃。后来别人好心告诉他正确的念法,改了以后反而没有以前的功夫了。这是什么原因呢?去思惟思惟就知道了。

人不要老陷在自我当中,这样无论干什么都不会有所收获。比如你在库房服务,每天给人拿东西,觉得这不是修行,所以越干越烦恼。

但是如果转个心念,见工人取东西来了,和颜悦色地对他说:“工人师父,您要什么?”“我要那个钳子。”“好,阿弥陀佛,吉祥!”然后给人家,这样结果完全不一样了。所以,和每个人接触的时候都要心怀善意,而且对对方有一种美好的祝愿,这样自自然然和人结了好多的善缘,你说这是不是修行?

菩萨戒告诉我们,到了聚落见任何众生都是应该念归依的。难道聚落的人都能听到你给他们念的归依吗?不可能的,而是通过这个机会培养你自己的菩提心。我们研究菩提心,天天要发菩提心,什么是菩提心?护念众生,肯为众生付出,这就是菩提心。它表现在我们的起心动念、说话办事当中。

所以,修行就看我们会不会修,会修行的人走到哪里都能修。又比如上街,看到过路的人你给他们祝愿:希望你们有因缘能归依三宝,离恶向善,让我们共成佛道!这样你的心念念念都没有空过,和众生也结了很多的善缘。

反之,如果你这样想:我现在不度你们,等我成佛了再说吧!那你把度生的因缘都错过去了。因为没和众生结缘,众生见了你也不大喜欢,有些根本不喜欢。

修学佛法一定要落实到生活当中来,吃饭穿衣,接人待物,懂得用心,都是修行。如果有事可做,认真做好。空闲的时候好好地坐下来诵经、拜佛、禅定,这样自然就会法喜充满、快乐自在地度过每一天。


Before you think good or evil, who are you?

-- Venerable Hui Neng


Saturday 28 September 2019

Three Steps to Making Friends with Yourself

by Judy Lief

What do we really know about ourselves? Sometimes it feels as if all day long we are switching between various masks. It’s as though we are always trying to be someone. We do a lot of pretending.

We might put on the mask of the hard worker, or the slacker. We might switch to our sociable mask, or the “I am an interesting person” one. Perhaps we then go to the “I look intelligent” one, or the “I am pretending to be interested” one. There are so many choices. We are expected — or expect ourselves — to be a certain way and that is the mask we put on. We need to look the part.

Our participation in this game of appearances can become so second nature to us that we hardly notice it. But occasionally we ask ourselves, which of these is the real me? Apart from all these appearances, who am I really? Do I actually know? We might wonder, do I really want to know? We are afraid of what we might find out.

According to my teacher, Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche, making friends with ourselves is at the very core of meditation practice, from beginning to end and all the way through. It is both the basis and the goal of the path.

But aren’t we already too full of ourselves, you might ask? Don’t we need to cut down our self-focus instead of building it up? Aren’t we already friends with ourselves? After all, thoughts about I, me, and mine are pretty much all that occupies our minds.

The path of friendship Trungpa Rinpoche referred to is very different from this. It is a journey to truly knowing ourselves, rather than building ourselves up.

Many of us suffer from a kind of low-grade fever of self-doubt. We feel that apart from all those roles we play, we are of little value. We feel that deep down we are unworthy, so we engage in a constant game of trying to convince ourselves otherwise. We try to look the right way, say the right words, be with the right people, do the right things.

Because of our inner poverty mentality and self-doubt, we need constant reassurance. People like me, so I must be worthy. I am a good student, so I must be okay. I have a lot of success, so I must be worthy, even special. But our feeling of hollowness doesn’t go away.

Some people think the answer to this is to build people up, praising them for every little thing, and trying to convince them that they are good. The idea is that if we keep hearing that we are okay, we will begin to believe it.

This approach is a good starting point, and it is certainly better than always hearing about how bad we are. The problem is that it can lead to a situation where on top of feeling bad about ourselves, we also have the pressure of trying to feel good, or at least pretending to.

Basically, no matter how skillful we are at juggling our various masks, the juggling act is fundamentally dissatisfying. There are masks we like and those we don’t, but as to the mask wearer — who we are beneath all that — we are clueless.

Strangely, although you are your most intimate companion, you are in some ways the most hidden from yourself. So the process of making friends with yourself goes hand in hand with getting to know yourself at a deeper level. To truly make friends with yourself, you need to go through a process of getting to know this mask wearer — the one without any mask.

The journey of truly making friends with yourself is quite a radical one. It goes beyond simply feeling good about yourself, and it is not based on convincing yourself of anything or being convinced of anything by others.

This journey of deep friendship does not rely on credentials or affirmations, but on a tender step-by-step process of opening. It’s not as if you finally figure yourself out and that’s it. This deepening of self-knowledge and friendship continues. It is a natural unfolding. Here is how it happens on the path of meditation.

As Trungpa Rinpoche said, friendship with yourself is both the basis and goal of meditation practice. Here is how it unfolds according to the traditional Buddhist logic of ground, path, and fruition.

THE GROUND: A GLIMPSE POSSIBILITY 

You start your journey to this kind of friendship the moment you first decide to meditate. Something has inspired you to remove yourself for periods of time from the everyday world, where there is so much pressure to constantly prove yourself to others and yourself. You have made the choice to see what it is like to sit simply and alone with nothing to do and no one to impress.

This step is all about curiosity, inquisitiveness, and the longing to meet yourself at a deeper level. It is based on a suspicion — or even a glimpse of inner knowing — that what you discover will be reliable, true, genuine, and worthy.

In meditation practice, we pare everything down to our immediate, moment-to-moment experience. We learn how to rest simply and be open to whatever arises in our minds. We are given just a few basic guidelines. We are told to observe whatever arises without judgement, not clinging to what we prefer or pushing away what we dislike. We are taught how our thoughts capture us, and how we can simply let them come and go like clouds in the sky. We are encouraged to be steady as our emotional states rise and fall, rather than being jerked up and down by every passing mood.

In short, we are encouraged to take a fresh look at our experience. In the context of making friends with yourself, starting fresh means that you drop your ideas of who you are or who you should be and just look. (You could also try this approach when you meet a new acquaintance — pause for a moment, instead of instantly sizing them up, and try to see that person with fresh eyes.)

There is a quality of tenderness in meditation practice. It is as though a mental window opens and you catch a glimpse of something trustworthy and good within yourself. That glimpse awakens a longing within you. You know you have discovered something valuable and you want to figure out how to go further with it. You realise that you have tapped into an inner dynamism or force for growth.

Although you might have many such glimpses, they usually are not all that stable. They tend to be not only brief but subtle, and because such glimpses are not all that graspable, self-doubt easily creeps back in. You are pretty sure you are onto something good, but maybe it’s too good to be true. At the same time, without your familiar masks and credentials, you feel a bit naked and groundless.

THE PATH: KNOWING, ACCEPTING, LOVING

We began with a sense of our potential. Something very positive has provided our initial inspiration and gotten us started. It has awakened our innate instinct to grow.

That positive vision has provided the ground, but it has also shaken things up. That glimpse of our potential has made it painfully evident how much we have shortchanged ourselves. The way our minds work is by opposites and contrast — good-bad, up-down, in-out, etc.— so glimpses of wholesomeness simultaneously provide glimpses of the opposite. They heighten our feelings of self-doubt, confusion, and lack of genuineness. That poignant contrast is where the real work of friendship begins.

As we practice, we uncover our layers and layers of ideas about ourselves. We uncover memories and hidden corners of our experience. We begin to come up against the limits of our love and friendship for ourselves, and for others as well. It is clear that we habitually compartmentalise ourselves, accepting some aspects of our experience and rejecting others. Some parts of us are so well hidden away that we can pretend they are not there at all.

What friendship we have at this level is quite feeble. It relies on keeping up firewalls to prevent what we dislike or even hate about ourselves from creeping in. Friendship is reduced to a matter of like and dislike.

As we see this in ourselves, we also begin to see the limited nature of our friendship with others. It might seem as if the way to cultivate greater friendship with ourselves, and in turn with others, would be to get rid of as many bad parts as possible. What is left is acceptable and good — it is friend-worthy. We think that if we edit out all our unworthy parts, it will solve the problem. But the real friendship we cultivate in meditation practice is not a matter of like or dislike, and it is not based on getting rid of anything.

Halfhearted friendship is quite fragile. We need to be on the defensive all the time. When we place all sorts of conditions on what or who is worthy of our love and friendship, our love easily flips into disappointment — or even hate — when those conditions are not met.

The challenge of the path of meditation is to continually expand the bounds of our heart, the bounds of our love and friendship. We start with ourselves. By resting simply and looking inside, we touch in with what we actually feel about ourselves.

We come up against our fear of opening up to the whole of our experience. We come up against our embarrassment and feelings of unworthiness or inadequacy. We also come up against our incredible arrogance, which is another manifestation of our fear. And by taking an honest look at the kinds of thoughts and feelings we have, we learn a lot about the limits we place on our friendship with others.

All along the way, the meditative path is one of greater opening and acceptance. We are learning to accept and befriend not just the parts we like, but the parts of ourselves we dislike as well. Sometimes we identify with only our acceptable side, with our successes, and at other times we identify with our flaws and failures. We buy into our thoughts of the moment. But as our meditation practice progresses, we start to touch in more with the mind that sees both sides. We begin to identify with the seeing itself, the observer of our stream of thoughts and opinions. Rather than latching onto one part of us as an identity to cling to, we find we do not need to fixate on either extreme. We learn not to fixate on being one way or another. We are all those things, and our experience is constantly in flux.

Of course, there will always be aspects of ourselves we like and those we dislike, aspects we are proud of and other aspects we are ashamed of. But the more clearly we come to know all these aspects, the more we are able to relax a bit. Instead of seeing so much of who we are as a threat to who we think we should be, we begin to see all of it simply as what we have to work with.

It is as if we are coming out of battle mode and declaring a truce, or signing a peace treaty. We don’t have to fight with ourselves anymore. As we continue with meditation practice and become more familiar with our extremes of thought and feeling, we begin to appreciate the whole spectrum. In fact, we may discover that our failures and flaws are more powerful teachers than our successes.

The benefit of sitting practice is that the more we stay with our experience, without overthinking it or trying to fix anything, the clearer we become about our strengths and weaknesses, our accomplishments and failures, our obstacles and our breakthroughs. Both aspects are challenging. As we begin to sense the extent of our potential as human beings, and how far we could go with our practice and our life, it is almost overwhelming. At the same time, we begin to feel in our guts the terrible burden we carry because of our fixed views and habits.

As we get more familiar with our patterns, we see that we can’t just sweep them all under the rug. The process works like this: we begin to accept the way things are, and as soon as we do that, we take one step further, from mere acceptance to profound appreciation. The more aspects of ourselves we know and accept, the freer we feel. The more that is out in the open, the less threatened we feel. The less we have to hide, the more relaxed and loving we become.

Coming to appreciate ourselves in this way doesn’t mean we become complacent or lackadaisical. Accepting our extremes doesn’t mean that we can’t make decisions about what is beneficial and what is harmful. In fact, we become less fuzzy about what uplifts us and what drags us down. But we don’t take it all that personally. It is just information. It can help us decide what to avoid and what to cultivate on the path and in our life altogether. Now, when we act, we do so from a realistic perspective and from a feeling of warmth and friendship.

Meditation practice is almost like a courtship with ourselves. Through sitting practice, we learn to relax and become less defensive. Every so often, we forget to maintain our facade for a moment, and to our surprise our world does not fall apart. Instead, we make discoveries and experience breakthroughs. It is hard to cut through our fantasies and take a realistic look at ourselves, but it is also a big relief. There is something very enjoyable about the whole process. We find that the more aspects of ourselves we welcome and invite in, the lighter we feel. The burden of self-protection is a heavy one, and it feels good to let it go. We are more likeable without it.

FRUITION: FRIENDSHIP WITH YOURSELF, LOVE FOR OTHER BEINGS

There is no particular end point to the process of making friends with yourself. But there is spillover: each time you accept and open your heart to yourself in all your flawed glory, you become a bit more open to those around you. As you develop a base of friendship with yourself, the quality of your meditation practice, as well as of your daily life, changes for the better. Your mindfulness practice begins to be warmed by tenderness.

It is as though a deeper quality of love is out there, just waiting for an opening, and as soon as you extend even a tiny invitation, it comes streaming in. In meditation practice, you are simultaneously taming the mind and opening the heart. It is so simple and natural: from interest comes knowing, from knowing comes acceptance, and from acceptance comes love.


The sole cause of peace is loving-kindness, the sole cause of suffering is self-grasping.

-- Garchen Rinpoche


Friday 27 September 2019

人生之苦迫及其解脱

太虚大师

吾人因何而讲究佛法耶?因吾人既已受得人身,常遇困苦拂逆之境,若欲解脱出离,则有讲求佛法之必要。此不但讲求佛法为然,凡吾人所云为动作,皆因解决现前困境而发动,如饥求食,寒求衣,住求房屋等。又因求食遂连带求榖米而讲农作烹饪等事。人生之苦多矣!自呱呱堕地后,必有生活之能力乃能求得衣食住,故幼年必须研究种种学问,学习种种技艺;又有老病衰弱等苦,此属于自身者也。又天灾水旱、猛兽毒蛇、瘟疫、饥馑、险巇坎坷等,此种种苦恼属于自然界者也。人生不能单独生活,必赖群众共相维系,乃能共同生活;因此需要,遂又发生种种盗贼战祸、制牵连累、妒嫉毁辱、争夺谋害等等苦恼,此属于人为界者也。

婴儿出胎即哭,可见人生忧苦与生俱来;此一声之哭,即表示其当时所感最为痛苦,且似自知后此之苦方接踵而俱来者,此为生苦。童年时代种种生活皆不能完全自主,故一般童子之心理,多以为迨我成年便觉快乐。及至成年,则由壮而老,遂又感受种种痛苦,如六根渐坏,身体衰弱不能享受人生圆满之幸福,此为老苦。若壮年时四大轻安,环境顺适,似足称为乐矣,乃忽焉疾病发生,身体上感受种种痛苦,而与老年、童年时无异,此为痛苦。吾人有生必有死,此死之一关为人人所不愿到,而又为人人所不能免。及至大命将倾,莫可奈何!最后一棺附身,万事皆已!面对此死魔终无术逃避,此为死苦。

生老病死四苦固为人人所同具而不能免,此外则恩爱者欲求其常聚,乃事实之结果往往而有生离死别等事发生,而演为爱别离苦。又人所爱护之物而终久不能保持存在,当其损坏亡失之时,则对于所爱之物亦感受一种爱别离苦。恩爱之反面为怨憎。吾人对于所怨憎之人,或厌弃之处所事物,常不欲其聚会;乃事实往往不然,如冤家聚头,仇人见面等事,此为怨憎会苦。

前说人生在世因欲维持其生命,及发展其种种乐欲,故有衣食住、名誉、光荣、威势、权利等等要求,人人如是向前驰求,不能无冲突制限,所以往往求而不得;此求而不得之情事,亦能使吾人感受苦恼,是为求不得苦。

求不得之反面尚有所谓舍不得苦者,如人因饥寒而求衣食,傥有人知求食之苦由于饥饿,而欲将此饥饿舍却而卒不可舍,推而至于生老病死等皆欲舍而不得,是为舍不得苦。

总之、吾人既落形气之中,头出头没无往非苦,总前八种痛苦观之,可知吾人之一生无时不沉沦苦海中,故欲求出离解脱此各种苦恼,而须研求佛法。盖纯正之佛法,乃可以指导吾人出脱苦海永得安乐之方法也。何则?前之诸苦非是天造地设,亦非自然化生,且非决不可出离,乃由因缘聚合而成之果。故欲免除苦果,须依佛法上所说苦果之因缘,而不再作此能感苦果之因缘,则可免苦矣。

吾人若能确信万法皆由自心所造,万法又不能超出因果律,故从此一心自造善因则可不感恶果。盖前说种种苦痛乃由自心所造成,非从外来;仍可由自心改造而出脱也。吾人灵明之心以向来未觉故而起贪、嗔、痴等惑,复由此迷惑而起种种行业,行业既起自然而感受苦果,故欲免苦,须先将此一心上所俱起之根本无明及三毒烦恼磨治尽净,方能断惑止业则苦免矣。

此贪、嗔、痴之三毒,不但能使吾人生时发生现行之惑业,傥不磨治尽净,虽色身死灭而此心中之三毒,仍能起惑造业而为苦果之因。三毒既为众苦之因,欲免苦须断三毒。然则何法以对治三毒,断除三毒乎?佛法一大藏教,法门无量皆为演说戒、定、慧三德以治除贪、嗔、痴三毒;即戒以治贪,定以治嗔,慧以治痴。然戒定慧之理,非一二言句所能宣说,佛有方便法门,即以念西方阿弥陀佛名号为方法,念念相续,勤行精进,信愿往生极乐世界,此念佛之念头即是戒、定、慧,即能治除贪、嗔、痴,若念到一心不乱乘愿往生之时,即是真正永久越出苦海之时也。简便易行,愿听众谛信之!


Every person whose heart is moved by love and compassion, who deeply and sincerely acts for the benefit of others without concern for fame, profit, social position, or recognition expresses the activity of Chenrezig.

-- Bokar Rinpoche


Thursday 26 September 2019

Hidden Reefs - Recognising the Intricacy of our Mind Patterns

by Rob Nairn

So far we have covered a few basic areas such as why we meditate, what meditation is, and the motivation for meditating. In the first chapter we looked at the method and the effect of meditating and I focused quite a bit on the importance of being clear about the attitude we bring to the meditation and the importance of learning to accept ourselves and come to terms with what is there. I made the point that meditation isn't technique because if we get into the mindset of thinking of it in that way then we expect to achieve results and to have success, and then we fear failure.

Another problem arises if we work with technique: we work with something which is manipulating the mind, whereas the purpose of meditation is to release the grasping action of the mind so that the inherently enlightened qualities can manifest. That can't be done through the application of a technique. All technique does is rearrange the existing mind patterns. Although it is not difficult to understand the method in meditation, it is difficult to understand what we need to bring to it in terms of attitude. The basis of that is complete openness. An open acceptance of ourselves the way we are.

That's easy to say and we hear it a lot in life but what it means is recognising the intricacy of our mind patterns. The extent to which we are continually judging and evaluating the contents of our own inner environment. How the thoughts, the feelings, the sensations, the moods, whatever they are that arise and pass within the mind, are under continual surveillance. That surveillance is there because we want to check it out and know whether it's what we want or what we don't want. If it is what we want, we grasp it. We try and hold it. For example, if a mood, or a mind state arises that we like, we want that to stay. We want to be like that all the time. And the mind says, This is how it should be.' So we try and grasp that but the very act of grasping destroys it. So the joyful clarity of the mind, which is inherent within the non-grasping mind is continually lost through the egocentric grasping action.

Conversely, if mind states arise which we don't like, we try and push them out. We want to get rid of them. We don't want to feel them. We don't want to know them. So repression, suppression, projection, denial, all those psychological mechanisms come into play. These are the means by which we keep ourselves in a continual state of unrest, tension and dissatisfaction. While those non-accepting mind states are present, the mind cannot rest because it is in conflict with itself all the time. If a thought or a feeling arises that we don't like, then we try and push it out. We then not only have the negative emotional state, but we have the conflict of trying to be rid of it. If, in meditation, we are not aware of this — which most people aren't — instead of meditating, what we will do is engage in a semi-conscious unseen war against our own mind states. We'll try and use the meditation as a means of continually avoiding what we don't want to be with and continually trying to nudge thoughts and feelings out of the mind that we don't like.

What that will produce, in the initial stages, is tension. A sense of not achieving or of failing. A sense of struggle. If it goes on a bit longer it produces a rigid mind. If it still goes on after that it produces a paranoid mind. So our meditation goes into reverse. We aren't meditating; we're just tightening the bolts. Making the mind tighter and tighter.

This is why it is so important to look at this issue of attitude right at the outset. We say to ourselves, This is it. This is what I have to work with. Let's find out about it. Let's be clear about it and come to terms with it. A full, unqualified acceptance of the way I am.

We are told that what a growing infant needs most is unconditional love. If we develop this attitude of acceptance, we develop unconditional love towards ourselves. We let go of all the conditions where we accept ourselves if this, or we don't accept ourselves if that. This then is the basis of compassion. Acceptance produces an extremely resilient mind because inwardly the mind is relaxed and OK about itself. Then whatever arises in the way of thought or emotion can be accepted and worked with comfortably without fear or reactivity. That is why the first issue we always focus on is our attitude.

Motivation then is the next big important thing. Within the Buddhist system, the fundamental motivation is to transform our own minds in order to be able to help others. That is the primary concern. If we can sort out our own minds and develop the inner qualities, then we will be able to help others. Although meditation is often seen as a selfish activity, because we are continually working with ourselves, it is the most altruistic thing we can do. This is because, what is within the mind is what we will express in the environment around us. If our mind is loaded with secretly oppressed negativity, that is what we will inevitably express in the environment around us. There is no option. If however we learn to come to terms with all the negativity and learn to transform it, then what will automatically be projected into the environment will be love, compassion, clarity and wisdom.

The basis of meditation, then, is the method of mindfulness. Bringing the mind into the moment. The first consequence of training in mindfulness will be tranquillity, when the mind begins to settle while being released from the causes of inner turbulence. In Sanskrit, tranquillity is called samatha. Out of the tranquillity arises the capacity to see what is really going on within the mind and this is called penetrating insight. The Sanskrit word is vipassana. This is where the mind, through its clarity which comes about due to tranquillity, develops its inherent power to see and know and understand exactly what is happening within it. Through this we begin to gain true understanding about ourselves.

The big distinction between meditation and learning is that meditation leads to wisdom and compassion because there is a process of true understanding through direct experience and observation of our own mind states. Learning is acquiring information and adding it to the mind. Learning will never penetrate to the depth of meditation because it is simply acquiring new concepts. The more we meditate, the more we realise that concepts are superficial. They only have to do with the rational, conscious, logical intellectual mind. There is a very definite point in meditation where we have to let go of all that. So it's a case of moving from fixation on the conceptual, rational mind and learning to move inward and trust ourselves and our own instinctive understanding that arises through insight and self-perception.


Ignorant ones believe that "emptiness" is nihilism. The extreme of nihilism undermines the accumulation of virtue. Those who desire flowers in the sky destroy the harvest of virtue with the hail of perverted views.

-- Marpa


Wednesday 25 September 2019

如何面对顺境与逆境

惟覺老和尚

问题一:

我们要怎样去判断一件事,它到底是好还是坏?尤其当别人都不认为这件事是可行的时候,我们到底该如何别具慧眼去衡量呢?

老和尚开示:

人生的遭遇,不是好的,就是坏的。在佛法来讲,好的就是顺境,坏的就是逆境。我们对于顺境与逆境,应该抱持什么样的态度?面对顺、逆境我们应该要保持一个「忍」字,保持「正定」。

好的境界,如果没有正定,好的事情也会变成坏事情,就是一般人说的「乐极生悲」。遇到坏的事情,仓皇失措,这也不对;一般人说大患之后必有后福,所以坏事情不一定真正是坏事情。佛法讲:「顺逆皆方便」,顺境和逆境都是助道的方便,都是在帮助我们作人做事乃至于成道的方便。

以前在印度有一位皇帝,他带了大臣上山去狩猎,走了一段时间,肚子饿了,口也渴了,就要大臣解决这个问题。这位大臣看到山上有一棵树,长了很多的果实,又红又大,就把这果子摘下来,准备解渴充饥。皇帝一拿到这个果子,用刀一削,稍不注意,把自己的手削掉一块,流了很多的血,这时痛得要命,就起了无明,生了烦恼,把这位大臣痛骂一顿。

这位大臣听到皇帝责骂他,马上就说:「大王啊!你破皮流血不一定是坏事情。」皇帝听了,大发雷霆,说道:「痛得要命又流血,怎么不是坏事情?你这个蠢材真是和我作对。」皇帝脾气一来,就把这位大臣赶回宫里去了。

正在这个时候,山上来了一群野人,准备要找一个人去祭拜天神。过去在印度的边疆有一种迷信,每年都要找一个人,用他的心去祭拜天神。这群野人就把皇帝抓起来献给酋长去祭拜天神,酋长命令他的部下,把皇帝的衣服脱掉,正准备要开肠破肚挖心时,忽然看到这位皇帝的手正在流血,觉得这很不吉祥、不庄严,因为这样祭拜天神就失去了恭敬心,于是把皇帝放走了。

这时候皇帝才觉得大臣所说的是对的,破皮流血不一定是坏事情,而且还救了自己的命,变成了好事情。皇帝非常感谢大臣,就赶快回到皇宫。皇帝觉得很对不起大臣,就问:「我在山上发脾气把你骂走了,你心中恨不恨我?」这位大臣讲:「启禀皇帝,我不但不恨你,而且还非常地感激你。」皇帝就问:「为什么呢?」他说:「如果你不把我赶走,这群野人一定把我抓进去开肠破肚挖心祭拜天神,所以我非常感谢你救了我一命。」

由这些事情可以知道,祸与福是不一定的,无论我们面对的是顺境或逆境,都要本着正念,从正面的想法来处理事情,做任何事情都能够成功,遇到坏的事情也会变成好的,遇到好的事情则会变得更好、更完美。


It is important to recognise the power of our emotions-and to take responsibility for them by creating a light and positive atmosphere around ourselves. This attitude of joy that we create helps alleviate states of hopelessness, loneliness, and despair. Our relationships with others thus naturally improve, and little by little the whole of society becomes more positive and balanced.

-- Tarthang Tulku Rinpoche


Tuesday 24 September 2019

Awakening Self-Compassion

by Jack Kornfield

We are so quick to judge one another. Just as we are hard on others we are even harder on ourselves. With mindfulness, our natural compassion grows. We can see that we are all carrying our own burden of tears. You and everyone you meet are sharing some measure of the pain that is present on the planet. You are called upon to witness this pain — in yourself and others — with compassion. But how can we do this when we live at a time where it seems we have lost contact with the power of mercy and compassion, when we have closed off to the suffering of ourselves and others?

We have to begin to sense the tears for ourselves before we can cry for others. These tears are actually a great gift. They are the same moisture that brings new life out of the dry earth every spring. For the Lakota Sioux, grief is considered a great gift because they believe the gods are closest to us when we are suffering. When a Lakota Sioux has suffered a great loss and is grieving, he or she is considered wacan, or “most holy”. Their prayers are believed to be especially powerful, and others will often ask one who grieves to pray on their behalf.

This doesn’t mean that compassion will be easy, especially when you’ve been betrayed or you’ve suffered some irreplaceable loss. As the Sufis pray, “May I overcome any bitterness that may have come because I am not up to the magnitude of the pain that has been entrusted to me.”

You may want to heal, but still find yourself slipping back into old habits of anger and resentment. This can be most frustrating. After struggling for half a century with the British Empire, Mahatma Gandhi said that his most formidable opponent was not the British Empire or the Indian people, but a man named Mohandas K. Gandhi — himself. “With him I seem to have very little influence.”

But it is necessary to learn that you are worthy of being loved. As the Buddha put it quite simply: “You can search the whole tenfold universe and not find a single being more worthy of love and compassion than the one seated here — yourself.” Self-compassion and self forgiveness are not weaknesses, but the roots of our courage and magnanimity. Sometimes compassion for ourselves and others seems hard to find. But even if you lose touch with these feelings during your most intense suffering, compassion is an essential part of our true nature. In fact, it is in this self-compassion and self-love that you find the strength to carry on through your darkest nights. It is by first practising self-compassion that you find not only a way to hold your own struggles and sorrows in your heart — but through them you learn how to connect with the sufferings and sorrows of all those around.

This self-compassion helps us all survive. It causes us to jump out of the way of an unexpected fast car as we enter the street. We treasure our life. Self-compassion struggles to keep us alive even in situations of complete abandonment and abuse.

As you go through your difficulties, you can learn to bring a quality of loving care to everything you touch. You will find that love and care have an extraordinary capacity to transform the sorrows of your life into a great stream of compassion.

Be gentle with yourself — it should not be a struggle. Know your limitations. Extend your compassion only as far as you feel your heart opening naturally. Plant your seed of trust. It will grow in its season.

As you face loss, frustration, hurt and conflict, invite a sense of your own dignity. Sit up, stand up tall. Have respect, patience and compassion for yourself. With these, you can handle anything.


Realising that insight well yoked to quiescence brings destruction of the mental afflictions, one should pursue quiescence first, by engaging in detachment toward the world.

-- Shantideva


Monday 23 September 2019

始觉平生被眼瞒

文| 慎言

守端禅师开悟后,经常说法传禅,教化了很多弟子。他在教化弟子时,常常打破弟子的情思妄见,让弟子们能够观照自心,心不外求。他曾作有一首《蝇子透窗偈》,来表达自己的参禅观点。偈云:

为爱寻光纸上钻,不能透处,多难。
忽然撞着来时路,始觉平生被眼瞒。

白云守端禅师的这首诗歌是以蝇子透窗说明修禅的道理。蝇子为爱寻光被窗纸透亮的假象所骗,猛钻窗纸,但却总透不过。守端禅师就是以蝇子钻窗纸来比喻一些禅子钻故纸堆。即把钻故纸堆即读诵经书作为寻找佛道之法;即把钻故纸堆像蝇子一样当作寻光之道,但结果也总透不过。禅师以此说明,以读经书钻语言文字的牛角尖,来达到明心见性的目的是不正确的。

而后守端禅师又写蝇子忽然又撞到飞来时的路,才认识到钻窗纸是被眼睛的错觉所骗,这指的是禅子 以往凭错觉向外求觅是盲目的,而自己来时从大路飞进才是正道,这来时之路也即是指从内心自性中求得开悟,才是正道。

从守端禅师的这首诗偈可以看出,守端禅师是不主张通过读诵经典来明心见性的。他和前代的许多祖师一样,认为真正的悟道都是在诸如运水搬柴、穿衣吃饭、屙屎放尿等日常生活中来实现的。守端禅师很多的法语都表达了这种思想。如守端禅师一次上堂:释迦老子有四弘誓愿云:“众生无边誓愿度,烦恼无尽誓愿断,法门无量誓愿学,佛道无上誓愿成。”我亦有四弘誓愿:“饥来要吃饭,寒到即添衣,困时伸脚睡,热处爱风吹。”

守端禅师这种思想,正反映了他那种平常心是道 的主张。他认为一个禅子如果单纯地喜欢寻章摘句, 对经典爱不释手,通过这种方式来达到明心见性的目的是很难,甚至是与悟禅之旨相背离的。这种对语言文字的执着,反而会妨碍你的真如本性的显现。只有将佛法落实在我们的日常生活中,才能够勘验我们的知见和功夫,进而能够了解祖师西来意的宗旨。

与守端禅师反对通过读诵经典求开悟的观点相类似,在禅宗史上还有另一则典故:唐朝芙蓉山的古灵神赞禅师,曾向百丈禅师学道,开悟后,回到故乡,他的剃度师父还没有开悟,他就常常在语言中启发师父。有一次,师父看经时,窗户上有一只苍蝇正在盲飞乱撞,他就自言自语:“世间如许广阔,你不肯飞出去,只撞着这张纸做什么呢?”师父放下手中经典,望着古灵禅师,古灵又说偈:“空门不肯出,投窗也太痴;百年钻故纸,何日出头时?”

古灵禅师在言语中一再暗示师父:你为什么不从心地上用功夫?不去明心见性呢?要找寻真正的自己,光在经典文字上分别、求知有什么用?经典文字怎么能悟道呢?观照自心才能悟道呀!

师父听不懂古灵禅师的话,就放下经典问:“难道你已经得到消息了吗?”古灵禅师就回答:“弟子在百丈禅师处,已得到一个息处了。”师父就请他登座说法,古灵禅师只说了这样一句话:“百千法门只在方寸,河沙妙德总在心源。”

我们不要汲汲向身外追求佛法,要向内心开采无限宝藏。百千法门只在我们方寸之间;多似恒河沙的功德,在我们心的源头就可以找到呀!

禅宗里有则赵州八十犹行脚的故事,也说明在修行时心不外求、观照内心的重要作用。故事说:一位学僧向赵州参禅,问他:“宇宙有成住坏空,要是有一天,风吹初禅,水淹二禅,火烧三禅,世界毁坏时,我们的肉身还会不会存在呢?”赵州禅师回答:“随他去!”

赵州事后觉得自己的回答未必圆满,就想出外寻师访道,为了这句“随他去”,尽管赵州已是八十岁的老翁,却也穿起芒鞋,跋涉千山万水,寻师访道,留下了“一句随他语,千山走衲僧”的禅宗公案。

这则公案流传到明朝,莲池大师根据这则公案, 写了一首诗来叙述这件事:

赵州八十仍行脚,只为心头未悄然。
及至归来无一事,始知空费草鞋钱。

莲池大师的这首诗是说,赵州禅师虽已年届八十高龄,还要寻师访道。他之所以寻师访道,就是因为心中还有尚未明了之事。就是为了这件事,赵州禅师还要颠簸逆旅,四处寻找真切的答案。经过许多年以后,倦游归来,结果什么也没有得到,才知道自己过去在外面奔波寻找,只是缘木求鱼,空费了草鞋钱。

莲池大师的这首关于赵州行脚的诗歌告诉我们,“道”不必到外界去追求,无须到心外去寻觅, 因为道就在我们每个人的内心。如果我们迷糊了心智,像赵州禅师一般,被自己的心头妄见的眼睛所瞒,从而到处参访,即使走烂了多少双草鞋也于事无补。

无尽藏比丘尼的《春在枝头已十分》也是警戒禅子不要被眼瞒的诗歌。诗云:

尽日寻春不见春,芒鞋踏破岭头云。
归来偶把梅花嗅,春在枝头已十分。

诗歌以人寻春为喻,比喻那些修禅之人,为了见 到自己的本来面目,不是从自心中来观照证悟,却整天心向外求。他们或忙于朝拜名寺古刹,或忙于参访大德高僧。结果朝遍了名山古刹,访遍了大德高僧,弄得自己心力交瘁,却仍然一无所获。等到经过长久的参访,筋疲力尽回到家中的时候,他们才豁然醒悟,原来,他们费尽心思,耗尽体力四处寻访名师指导,竟然没有开悟,待到他们真正回归到本心了,才发现自己与佛无二无别的真如佛性如灵光乍现,显露无遗。此时,他们才明白诸佛所证悟的真如法身原来人人具足,不假外求,本自无缺。

这首著名的诗歌告诉禅宗学徒,“明心见性”一定要从自心中求,若心外求法,就是舍本逐末。若这样,你花费的时间越多,你就离悟道成佛越远。

其实,守端禅师的《始觉平生被眼瞒》诗,还告诉我们一个为人处事的哲理:就是在我们观察事物的时候,不能只看表面现象,而是要善于透过表面现象看到事物的本质,这样才能正确看待事物。如果你只是看到表面现象,被自己的眼睛所瞒,你就永远看不到事物的本质,导致对事物作出错误的判断。


Look at whatever may appear, in any of the ten directions. No matter how it may appear, the thing in itself, its very nature, is the sky-like nature of mind, beyond the projection and dissolution of thought and concept.

-- Nyoshul Khen Rinpoche


Sunday 22 September 2019

Chan: a Gateway to Wisdom

by Venerable Sheng Yen

You may have heard it said that Buddhism is not truly a religion but a philosophy. However, religion requires faith and Buddhism cannot be practiced without faith. So Buddhism is indeed a religion. We should understand, however, that faith in Buddhism is different from the faith that emphasises belief in a God distinct from oneself. The faith that Buddhism stresses is faith in the teachings of the Buddha. These teachings, called Dharma, tell us that everyone inherently has the nature of a Buddha and that everyone can attain Buddhahood. One who truly believes in the teachings of the Buddha and follows the principles and methods of practice can indeed become a Buddha.

When we talk about the origin of Chan Buddhism, we need to distinguish the specific ideas that shaped Chan from those of Buddhism in general. But the fact remains that the highest attainment in Buddhism — to become a Buddha — is also found in Chan. Buddhism emphasises the cultivation of wisdom, which resolves internal struggles and suffering. But how do we cultivate wisdom? We rely on the guidance of Chan methods, which have their foundation in the teachings of the Buddha.

Buddhism was first brought to China about one thousand years after Shakyamuni Buddha attained enlightenment and introduced the Dharma to the world. During Buddhism’s early period, meditation, or dhyana, was set forth as the primary method of practice. Dhyana is a method for clearing the mind of its illusions, which, in turn, leads to understanding the true nature of the self. This realisation is Buddhist wisdom. The teaching of dhyana as a path to wisdom was important to the transmission of Buddhism to China. In fact, the name Chan comes from the word dhyana (pronounced JA-na), just as the word Zen comes from the word Chan.

There are many stories in Chan lore about disciples asking their master such questions as, “What did Bodhidharma bring to China?” As you may know, Bodhidharma was a Caucasian monk who is considered the first patriarch of the Chan lineage. The answers all the masters gave appear to agree on one essential point: Bodhidharma brought to China the message that everyone can become a Buddha. When one disciple asked why, the master replied, “Because it (the Dharma) already existed in China.” The disciple continued, “Then why did Bodhidharma have to come?” The master answered, “If he did not come, people in China would not know that every one had Buddha-nature.” Bodhidharma brought to China nothing but himself, to spread the message that everyone should believe in one’s own Buddha-nature.

The Sixth Patriarch, Huineng (638-713), probably contributed the most to the development of Chan. His teaching, recorded in his Platform Sutra, can be summarised in the phrase: “No abiding, no thought, no form.” This phrase refers to a state of mind in which one perceives one’s own Buddha-nature, but even though we speak of a Buddha-nature we can point to no concrete form that is Buddha-nature. The phrase says that Buddha-nature is the essence of emptiness, or sunyata (Sanskrit). This teaching of “no abiding, no thought, no form” is consistent with the central teaching on emptiness in the Diamond Sutra. So, we see that the ideas of Chan are rooted in the Buddhist scriptures. The Diamond Sutra says that we should not mistake Buddha-nature for something concrete or unchangeable, for then Chan would be indistinguishable from a formal religion based on belief in something external, monolithic and unchanging.

A disciple of Master Zhaozhou (778-897), asked him. “Does a dog have Buddha-nature?” The master answered, “Wu,” which means ‘no,’ or ‘without.’ On the surface, this answer seems to contradict the teaching that all beings have Buddha-nature. But we need to understand that Buddha-nature is not concrete or unchanging, and Zhaozhou may have wanted to dispel any such notion this monk may have had. This kind of dialogue, which seems paradoxical, contradictory, even nonsensical, became a method of practice called gong’an (koan in Zen).

Chan Buddhism encompasses four key concepts of faith, understanding, practice, and realisation. Faith belongs to the realm of religion; understanding is philosophical; practice is belief put into action; and realisation is enlightenment. Without faith, we cannot understand; without understanding, we cannot practice; and without practice, we cannot realise enlightenment. Together, these four concepts create the gateway we can enter to realise wisdom.

We must begin Chan practice, then, with faith that all beings have Buddha-nature. However, we should not think of it as an entity that can be grasped or attained. If we cling to that kind of idea, we will also cling to the idea that a true self exists within us, and in so doing, obstruct our liberation. We accept the existence of Buddha-nature and then let it go, lest it become an obstacle to practice.

We must begin Chan practice, then, with faith that all beings have Buddha-nature. However, we should not think of it as an entity that can be grasped or attained. If we cling to that kind of idea, we will also cling to the idea that a true self exists within us, and in so doing, obstruct our liberation. We accept the existence of Buddha-nature and then let it go, lest it become an obstacle to practice.

Some early Chan masters like Huineng and Nanyue did not encourage prolonged meditation. There is the story about Mazu (709-788) and Master Nanyue (677-744). One day Nanyue observed Mazu meditating. He asked Mazu, “What are you doing?” Mazu replied, “I am meditating.” Nanyue asked, “Why?” Mazu responded, “To become a Buddha.” Saying nothing, Nanyue, picked up a brick and started polishing it with the sleeve of his robe. Mazu asked, “What are you doing?” Nanyue said, “I’m making a mirror.” Mazu asked, “You can’t make a mirror by polishing a brick.” Nanyue replied, “If I cannot make a mirror from a brick, how can you become a Buddha by meditating?” On hearing this Mazu had realisation. Later, he became a great master himself.

Does this famous gong’an mean that we need not meditate in order to become enlightened? I have been teaching meditation for many years and have come across quite a few practitioners who do not want meditation to take too much of their time, or cause too much discomfort. To them, I would say, “Unless you are Huineng or Nanyue, you need to meditate.” We may say that enlightenment does not come from meditation, but meditating is nonetheless a necessary step toward liberation. The best way to calm the mind is through meditation. Once the mind is calm, we can reduce the subjective and habitual patterns of self-based notions that cause so much vexation. When we achieve a tranquil or unified state of awareness, it is possible to see just what the self really is.

Chan teaching should work in conjunction with meditation. With the guidance of a good teacher, strong practice, and Chan teachings, enlightenment need not be far away.


If emptiness were taught in the very beginning to those who have not developed their intellect, very great ignorance would be produced; therefore, the Superiors do not teach emptiness in the very beginning.

-- Chandrakirti


Saturday 21 September 2019

都会过去

星云大师

佛教讲「三世」,即过去、现在、未来。不只是时间会过去,世间任何东西都会「过去」,「现在」不过是暂时的停留,「未来」的还是未知数。有人说「过去比现实美丽」,有人说「现在比过去进步」,所谓「白头宫女话当年」,可见过去确实值得回忆。

说到「过去」,长江后浪推前浪,世上新人赶旧人,人事就这样一代又一代的过去。多少的高楼大厦会成为过去,良辰美景也都成为明日黄花,追忆过去无补于现实,人生还是把握现在比较实际,因为一切都会成为过去,包括:

一、青春美貌都会过去:人生照说都是很平等的,每个人都有青春的时代,都有美貌健壮的岁月。但是在时间的巨轮里,一切都不会停歇,曾几何时,凡事都会过去。当青春时期,无烦无恼,身体健壮,只要家庭经济允许,要旅行,要出国,要社交,那一样不能让你趁心如意?但是岁月不待人,当青春美貌过去以后,一切就不一样了。

二、荣华富贵都会过去:「人穷志短」固然会过去,「叱吒风云」一样也会过去。看世间芸芸众生,多少人从白手起家,到达荣华富贵,又从荣华富贵,落得一文不名,所以世事无常,无论什么都会过去。多年前,佛光山功德主张姚宏影女士,她想捐钱让我办大学,我说现在大学尚未开始筹备,等正式开办的时候再告诉你。她说:我不知道等你办大学时,我还有钱没有钱?此言看似轻描淡写,实际上是她看透世事无常,知道「荣华总是三更梦,富贵还同九月霜」的智慧之语。

三、幸福快乐都会过去:有的人生长在豪门之家,一出生就享受幸福安乐的生活,不知道穷苦艰难的滋味是什么。但是依照社会学家的观察,世间「富贵不出三代」,所以幸福快乐的人生,在时间之流里,也会很快过去。因此,当幸福快乐的时候,要好好珍惜人生,切莫等到一切都化为乌有的时候 再来追忆,一切都已事过境迁,徒留遗憾。

四、烦恼痛苦都会过去:上述三种美好人生都会过去,以下三事,虽是坎坷人生,也会过去,烦恼痛苦即是其一。烦恼痛苦不是定型的人生,假如你有烦恼,找出原因,大部份都是由「我」而来,由「内心」生起。假如你找出烦恼的原因,找出痛苦的理由,能把原因消除,则烦恼痛苦的果实也就不存在了。

五、困境艰苦都会过去:有的人生活艰难,环境困苦;勤找职业,到处碰壁;自己创业,一直倒闭;亲戚远离,朋友不相往来。所以,在困境中过着艰苦的生活,着实恼人,也让人心有不甘。其实,困境艰苦,都有起因,也都会过去;贫苦穷困的人,也会荣华富贵。在艰难困境中,只要勤奋努力,一旦时来运转,飞黄腾达,财源不求自来。人,对前途不要失望,要充满信心,只要立志,只要用心,再怎么不好的生活境遇,都会过去。

六、人我是非都会过去:在生活里,有的人常对人间充满人我是非,感到不容易通过。其实,是非朝朝有,不听自然无。再多的闲话,再多的伤害,你不去理他,他自然会过去。所谓「处变不惊」、「以不变应万变」,人我是非也是非常短暂的,只要我们正直,只要我们正派,世间还有什么不能过去的呢?


Watchful of speech, well restrained in mind, let him do nought unskilful through his body. Let him purify these three ways of action and win the path realised by the sages.

--The  Buddha


Friday 20 September 2019

Experience and Response

by Geshe Sonam Rinchen

The next verses of Nagarjuna’s text show how the capacity to experience arises and how response to experience takes place while the unborn child is growing.

When name and form have come into being,
The six sources emerge.
In dependence on these six sources
Contact properly arises.

Gradually the fetus develops and the six sources — from the eye sense faculty to the mental faculty — are formed. The bases for these faculties are there from the outset, but this link is called the six sources because now the sources have developed and can function. The mental faculty and mental consciousness in a subtle form are present from the moment of conception.

At conception the entity of the living being came into existence. The attributes of that living being emerge with the development of the six sources and it now becomes a user of things, namely one who can engage with things. All of this is the maturation of an action performed in the past. 

What are the conditions that give rise to contact? In the third verse Nagarjuna underlines the vital role played by the faculties when he writes, “In dependence on these six sources contact properly arises.” However, a number of other factors are also important. The first two lines of the fourth verse indicate the various conditions which enable contact to occur.

It arises only through the eye,
A form, and that which remembers.
Therefore consciousness arises
In dependence on name and form.

For instance, a moment of visual consciousness arises through the main condition, the eye sense faculty, and through the focal condition, which is a visible form. The words “that which remembers” refer to the immediately preceding condition, which is any immediately preceding moment of awareness.

Nagarjuna says, “Consciousness arises in dependence on name and form.” In this context “name” refers to the preceding moment of mental activity and “form” to the visual object and the eye sense faculty. The latter two are both matter and are therefore regarded as form. A moment of visual consciousness occurs through the meeting or coming together of a visible form, the visual sense faculty, which resides in the eye, and a moment of awareness.

In the case of the child in the womb, mental consciousness and the mental faculty are present from the outset, and the moment of preceding mental activity, which occurs before visual perception can arise for the first time, is a moment of attention accompanying mental consciousness.

Contact is a combination of three —
Eye, form, and consciousness —
And from such contact
Feeling always arises.

Although Nagarjuna’s words appear to say that the coming together of the eye, form, and consciousness is contact, contact is actually the consequence of their coming together and is the ability to discern whether objects, such as smells, sounds, or tastes, are pleasant, unpleasant, or neutral. Contact occurs in association with any of the six kinds of consciousness through the presence of the faculty, the focal object, and a moment of awareness.

From contact, which enables distinction between what is agreeable, disagreeable, and neutral, feeling arises. Contact is the experience of the object, while feeling is the experience of maturation. Here maturation or fruition refers to pleasurable, painful, or neutral feelings or sensations that are a maturation or fruition of our past actions.

In relation to pleasant objects, agreeable feelings or sensations arise, while disagreeable feelings or sensations arise in relation to unpleasant objects. Neutral feelings are the response to objects discerned as neither attractive nor unattractive.

With the development of the six sources while the fetus is in the womb, the utiliser or experiencer comes into being and when feeling occurs experience is complete. Craving, grasping, and existence are the accomplishing causes. A seed produces either rice or barley depending on the kind of seed it is, but it needs moisture and a growing medium in order to sprout. While the seed determines the crop, it can only produce that crop if certain other conditions pertain. For the imprint implanted on consciousness to produce name and form, the six sources, contact, feeling, birth, and ageing and death, certain factors must come into play.

When the seed-like imprint comes into contact with moisture-like craving and grasping, it begins to sprout.

Conditioned by feeling there is craving
And the craving is for feeling.
Whenever there is this craving
Grasping of four kinds arises.

In a particular set of the twelve links this craving occurs in a lifetime immediately prior to the one in which the fetus experiences feeling as described above. The feeling on which the craving focuses is associated with the body and mind belonging to a different set of twelve links. The craving and grasping which triggered the imprint that produced this life occurred in a past life. More craving and grasping in this life will activate a dormant imprint and give rise to another rebirth.

The craving directed towards feelings is a desire not to be separated from pleasurable feelings, to be separated from painful feelings, and for neutral feelings not to decline. The craving related to pleasurable feelings may be to experience past pleasurable feelings again and not to lose what pleasure we enjoy at present. We also constantly reach out for future pleasure. The strong craving to avoid or end painful feelings can lead to a desire for self-destruction. People commit suicide because they cannot bear the suffering they are experiencing. There are many forms of craving associated with the three realms of existence. As our craving to experience pleasure and to be rid of suffering grows stronger, it induces grasping, an intensified form of craving.

Nagarjuna’s text says that grasping of four kinds occurs as a result of craving that focuses on feelings: grasping at the objects of the senses, which are what we desire; grasping at philosophical views; grasping at different forms of ethical discipline and modes of conduct as supreme; and grasping at the self.

Grasping at the objects of the senses is strong craving for visible forms, sounds, smells, tastes, or tactile sensations. In this context craving for the sense objects is an appreciation of them, as well as a desire for our experience of them and the enjoyment they induce not to stop. The grasping is a reaching out to experience that joy in the future. Ordinary lay people are primarily involved in this kind of craving and grasping.

The second kind of grasping refers to people’s adherence to views through which they hope to find happiness. The false view of the transitory collection is not included in these views.

The third kind of grasping is at misguided forms of discipline and conduct associated with wrong views. This includes attachment to extreme ascetic practices, such as applying fire to different parts of the body, fasting for long periods, physical mutilation, imitating the behaviour of pigs or dogs, and all exaggerated forms of austerity. People perform such practices in the hope of purifying wrongdoing and finding happiness.

The final kind of grasping described here is at views of the self, which refers principally to the false view of the transitory collection and pride in oneself. The eighth and ninth links are both disturbing emotions. The grasping emerges from the craving which has preceded it and produces existence, the tenth link. Craving focuses on this life and is attachment to it, while grasping is attachment to and a reaching out for future existence. The craving and grasping activate the imprint that was left on consciousness by formative action and make it ready to produce the next existence.

The tenth link marks complete readiness — and is the cause — for the body and mind of the next existence, so actually the name of the result has been given to the cause. It is like a seed that has come into contact with moisture and a growing medium and that is on the verge of sprouting. We might think that the activation of an imprint created by a positive action could only occur through constructive thoughts or feelings and not through disturbing emotions such as craving and grasping. Even if at death our state of mind is constructive, an element of craving and grasping will be present. Normally a lot of emphasis is placed on dying in a peaceful frame of mind with feelings of faith or kindness, because out of the many imprints we have this will trigger one that can lead to a good rebirth. It is also said that if we die with attachment or anger, for instance, this will activate a negative imprint and lead to a bad rebirth, so we must do whatever we can to insure neither we nor those we are helping die in a disturbed state.

When we ordinary people are dying, our mind becomes unclear because we do not have control over it. Even if our thoughts are positive, clinging to the self and to the well-being of the self are also active. When there is no clinging to the self, there is no fear. Grasping in the form of anxiety concerning our future well-being could have the beneficial effect of inducing us to make heartfelt prayers to our spiritual teachers or meditational deity. This would then insure a good rebirth.

When there is grasping, existence
Of the one who grasps occurs.
When there is no grasping, one is freed
And will not come into existence.

Grasping induces the state of readiness for the next rebirth, which is the tenth link. It is followed by conception and the new life. For those who understand the emptiness of all existent things and have familiarised themselves with it, craving related to feelings does not arise because they perceive the true nature of those feelings. The grasping, since it is intensified craving, cannot arise either, thereby preventing the occurrence of the tenth link.

Gaining a direct or non-dual understanding of reality does not instantly liberate us, but those who have a direct perception of reality will not take rebirth again in cyclic existence as a result of contaminated actions underlain by the disturbing emotions. Through continued familiarisation with this direct perception of reality, we will eventually gain complete freedom from cyclic existence.

Existence, moreover, is the five aggregates.
Through existence birth occurs.
Aging, death, and sorrow,
Lamentation and suffering,

Unhappiness and distress
All come from being born.
Thus these exclusively painful
Aggregates come into being.

Existence is the state where the imprint has been fully activated and is ready to yield the aggregates of the next rebirth. It is classed as action and is itself in the nature of the five aggregates: forms, feelings, discrimination, compositional factors, and the different kinds of consciousness.

How are the five aggregates associated with action in this context? Action may be virtuous or non-virtuous, and can be performed either physically, verbally, or mentally. From the point of view of the Chittamatrins and Svatantrikas, physical and verbal action are not classed as form but as intention, which is a mental factor or function. However, in any discussion of the twelve links from the Prasangika viewpoint, physical and verbal activities are considered to be form. Mental activity includes the aggregates of feeling and discrimination, while other mental functions belong to the aggregate of compositional factors. Accompanying these mental functions are different kinds of consciousness. Thus all five aggregates may be present. When the imprint of the previous virtuous or non-virtuous action has been triggered through craving and grasping, mental activity related to that imprint and the subtle physical and verbal expressions of that mental activity take place as death approaches. These constitute the link of existence and, as it were, attract and act as a bridge to the aggregates of the subsequent life.

When the first three links — ignorance, formative action, and consciousness — occur, name and form, the six sources, contact, and feeling, which are their projected result, do not yet exist. Once the seed has been implanted in consciousness, it will produce these four effects when it meets with the right conditions.