Wednesday, 5 September 2018

在家修行的居士,还有一个需要注意的是——烧香问题。

智宗法师

在寺院里常常见到众多的居士大把大把地,一捆一捆地,甚至是整箱整箱地在香炉里烧香,他们认为多烧多福,多烧香说明我心诚。这实际上也是一种毫无根据的偏见误解。这种偏见误解反映到生活中,就造成一系列的恶果,比如说,在行为上破坏卫生,污染环境;在信仰上,形成一种迷信现象,使我们佛教倍受现代文明社会的批评,成为落后不开化的代名词……所以说,多烧多燃的风气决不可长,更不可带到家里去。

居士在家中供佛,早晚各一支清香即可,不必求什么三支九支的。敬佛关键在于心诚,学佛也关键在于学佛一样的诚心。俗话讲,精诚所致,金石为开,我们学佛修行当然更是这个道理。从另一个方面来说,佛菩萨虽然是慈悲喜舍,广开方便,但却是无私的、平等的,如果说你多烧香佛菩萨就给予你多一些,那佛菩萨岂不成了人人痛恨的贪官污吏?那还是佛菩萨吗?!

其实,类似于多烧香多得福的错误认识,在居士中还有很多。像有些居士就认为,是居士,家里就该有佛像;还有居士认为,是居士,手里就该常拿有念珠;更有众多的居士坚决认定,修行就是念佛打坐,不打坐念佛就不是修行,是白过!……于是因这种种的认识,才有了有的居士不分场合,在单位开会发言也先来一句“阿弥陀佛”,搞得全单位人都怪怪的,觉得他别扭;也才有了有的居士不管大人怎么埋怨,小孩怎么哭闹,手头上怎么忙乱,他每天也要雷打不动地双腿往那儿一盘……我这样讲,绝不是说念佛打坐不是修行,更不是否认念佛打坐的实际功用,而是提醒在家修行的居士们,要切记念佛打坐只是众多修行方式中的一种方式,而不是唯一方式,「说法不在于嘴,禅修不在于腿」,这是在佛教丛林中人人都知道的道理,六祖也说:「道由心悟,岂在坐也?」从这里我们可以知道,打坐只是修心养性的基础方法之一,它并不是开悟的绝对方法,只有心的清净无杂、了了分明,才是证悟的关键。

古人讲:行亦禅,坐亦禅,语默动静体安然。一个修行人,如果行住坐卧四威仪都能够恒处定中,这才是了不起的修行。况且,对于在家居士而言,修行最起码的是在家庭生活中,在社会生活中,修整规范自己言行,越修越行,越修越让家人欢喜,越修越让社会接纳,越修越让大众钦敬。这才是大修行,真修行!

福德从何而来呢?

居士都读过《修福积德造命法》、《文昌帝君阴骘文》,还有《了凡四训》等等一类的书籍,回答这个问题自然是轻车熟路,一句话,福德从行善而来。行善积德,善行得福,这是历代祖师大德和社会贤达在诸多的典籍中多次指明的,那么,作为三宝弟子,佛教信徒,我们就更要依法从教,努力在日常生活中多做自己力所能及的好事善事,多学习观音菩萨寻声救苦,无处不现身的奉献精神。当然,我们所做的这个“善”和观音菩萨所做的比起来,那真是没法提,但也用不着比,因为我们虽然都是在学菩萨道,但毕竟还未成菩萨,像观音菩萨那种“无缘大慈、同体大悲”的大善、至善,恐怕没几个人能做到,不过,没关系,“千里之行始于足下”,我们可以先从和自己有缘的小善做起,从致力于建设和乐的家庭生活做起。

一提到建设家庭生活,有的居士可能会说,一说做善事,往往都是指什么修桥铺路、赈灾济贫、捐资助学,还有植树造林之类的,提建设幸福家庭生活是不是把我们的修行标准降低了?我们学佛的居士如果总想着建设自己幸福的小家庭,那是不是有些太自私了?当然不是!为什么呢?我们要知道:

第一,善行无远近。不能认为捐款救灾希望工程什么的才叫善,在家中恪尽家庭职责,孝敬老人、爱护子女什么的就不叫善。如果一个人在家中恶言劣行,在外却慈悲慷慨,我们只能说,像这样的人绝对是沽名钓誉的伪善。

第二,善行贵在日常坚持.一个人在某一次慈善活动中捐出大笔的捐款这并不稀奇,而一个人能在日常生活中始终坚持善行善意却是最难得的。要不毛主席也说嘛,一个人做一件好事并不难,难的是一辈子做好事啊。我们学佛不就要难行能行,难忍能忍吗?坚持最难行、最难忍!

第三,家庭是社会的基础,家庭是国家的基石。我们的这个世界就是由千千万万的小家庭所组成,如果我们居士们都能把自己的小家庭建设得幸福美满,那么,由众多的小家庭所组成的大社会自然也就稳定发展,社会稳定发展了,带来的当然是国家的繁荣富强,世界的和平兴旺。因而,对一个居士而言,建设幸福和乐的家庭生活,绝不是什么降低要求,自私自利,何况“一屋不扫,何以扫天下”?如果一个人连成为受欢迎、受爱戴的家庭成员都不能做到,或者说,连自己的家人都不爱,那么,这样的人走到社会上,我们还能期望他能爱别人,爱众生?期望他做到时时处处地让人挑大拇指,受人钦敬?由此可见,建设幸福的家庭生活,不唯不是自私自利,反而是对国家和社会作出实实在在的大贡献了!

说到建设家庭生活的重要性,在这里我讲一个我亲眼所见的故事。有一个年轻的居士在寺院里和人吵架了,旁边的一个老居士就把她拉到一边,苦口婆心地给她讲学佛首先要能忍人所不能忍的道理,啊,“嗔是心头火,能烧功德林”啊。年轻居士听得不住得点头。我就想,看来,这个老居士还挺会作思想工作的。哪知根本不是这么回事。那边老居士心满意足地刚走,这边年轻居士就脖子一扭,说,呸,还说我呢!你还不是刚和家里老头子吵完?看看,这就是没有建设好家庭生活的后果!难怪古人讲“己身不正何以正人”,自己都做不到,做不好,还有什么资格去教育别人?人家又怎么会听你的呢!

这里还要捎带着说一个不好的现象,就是我们有部分居士在家和在寺院的表现简直是天上人间,相差太远。不少人在寺院里是又和气,又勤快,还整天和个弥勒佛似的笑呵呵,真叫人欢喜,可要是一让家里人说说她在家的样子,哎呀呀,那简直是惨不忍睹!听反映,有些人为了不洗盘子不洗碗竟也能来个小吵三六九,更不用说,个别人为了家里人吃荤不吃荤的摔摔打打,鸡飞狗跳!在这种时候,我很难想像,像这样动不动在家里大闹天宫的人,也算是学佛修行?我这样说,有的居士可能接受不了,她们也许会说,这是天大的冤枉,我们这样做也是为了护法——比方说是为了能在寺院里做得更好,要保证休息啦,或者说,这也是为了度人——他们吃荤不是造业嘛。如果是这样的话,那么,我下面要讲的,大家更要认真的听。

什么是真正的护法?真正的护法可不仅仅是不顾家,不要家,长年泡在寺院里为寺院干活(这样最多称得上是小护法),而是能很好地利用自己是个居士的身份,深入民众,深入社会,弘扬妙法,普度众生!大家可以试想一下,观音菩萨也是现的在家像,如果她总想着到寺院里干活,认为这才是护法,那她还有时间去“千处祈求千处应,苦海常作度人舟”吗?还能是观音菩萨吗?当然,居士们也不要误会,我这样讲并不是反对居士到寺院里干活,我只是强调,我们做居士的不能把“护法”理解得太狭獈!

Reincarnation means there is a soul that goes out of your body and enters another body. That is a very popular, very wrong notion of continuation in Buddhism. If you think that there is a soul, a self, that inhabits a body, and that goes out when the body disintegrates and takes another form, that is not Buddhism.

When you look into a person, you see five skandhas, or elements: form, feelings, perceptions, mental formations, and consciousness. There is no soul, no self, outside of these five, so when the five elements go to dissolution, the karma, the actions, that you have performed in your lifetime is your continuation. What you have done and thought is still there as energy. You don’t need a soul, or a self, in order to continue.

It’s like a cloud. Even when the cloud is not there, it continues always as snow or rain. The cloud does not need to have a soul in order to continue. There’s no beginning and no end. You don’t need to wait until the total dissolution of this body to continue — you continue in every moment.

-- Thich Nhat Hanh

Tuesday, 4 September 2018

Parting from the Four Attachments: A Basic Teaching

by His Holiness Sakya Trizin

HISTORY OF THE TEACHING

We begin with a brief history of this teaching. When the great yogi, the Lama Sakyapa, Sachen Kunga Nyingpo, was twelve years old, one of his Gurus, Bari Lotsawa, advised him, “Since you are the son of a great spiritual teacher, it is necessary to study the Dharma, and to study the Dharma requires wisdom. The best way to acquire wisdom is to practise Manjushri.”

So, Bari Lotsawa gave Sachen Kunga Nyingpo the empowerment of Manjushri with all its relevant “lungs.” Then Sachen Kunga Nyingpo undertook a six-month retreat on Manjushri. At the beginning, there were some signs of obstacles, which he managed to purify through the practice of the wrathful Deity, Achala.

He continued his meditation and at one time, in his pure vision, he saw Arya Manjushri in the preaching mudra, sitting on a jewelled throne with two attendants.

At that very moment, he received a stream of insight-wisdom, as Manjushri bestowed this four-line teaching directly to him:

If you desire the worldly aims of this life, you are not a spiritual person;
If you desire further worldly existence, you don’t have the spirit of renunciation;
If you desire liberation for your own sake, you don’t have the enlightened attitude;
If you grasp at the view of ultimate reality, you don’t have the right view.

This four-line teaching includes the whole path of the Mahayana. After receiving this teaching, Sachen Kunga Nyingpo received a tremendous amount of insight-wisdom. He no longer needed to study everything that came to him. He became a truly great yogi.

Later in life, he bestowed this teaching upon his sons, Sonam Tsemo and Dragpa Gyaltsen, and they in turn bestowed it upon Sakya Pandita and so on. Even to this day, its transmission has never been broken, so therefore, it bears special blessings. Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen, the son of Sachen Kunga Nyingpo, wrote a commentary in verse to these four lines, and today still, this text serves as the root text for all these teachings.

“Parting from the Four Desires” is very similar to the preliminary teachings of the other Tibetan Buddhist traditions. For example, the Nyingma and the Kagyu traditions have a teaching on “Turning the Mind,” which also explains these four lines.

By meditating on this precious human life and on impermanence, you will be liberated from the sufferings that are inherent in this life. The suffering of samsara and the law of karma will turn you away from clinging to the round of existence. Love, compassion, and Bodhicitta will turn you away from clinging to this life as real.

We Sakyapas call it “The Parting from the Four Desires,” and Kagyu and Nyingma traditions call it “Turning the Mind Away from Clinging.” The name is different, but the teaching is the same.

According to the Gelugpa tradition, the preliminary teaching is divided into “The Paths of the Three Persons.” The first line explains the “small” person’s path, - a person who realises the lower realms are full of suffering and wishes to be born in the higher realms, such as that of the devas or humans. The middle person’s path is one that seeks self-liberation. This person is described in the second verse — they realise that the whole realm of existence is full of suffering, and therefore naturally seek self-liberation. The third line explains the great person’s path. This person realises that every sentient being has the same goal, and that instead of working for oneself, one should strive for the sake of all sentient beings to attain ultimate enlightenment. While the wording is different, the Gelugpa teaching is, nevertheless, the same as this four-line teaching of “Parting from the Four Desires.”

REFUGE

All Buddhist practices begin with taking refuge. In this teaching, one takes the Mahayana refuge. Mahayana refuge has special characteristics. There are four reasons why Mahayana refuge is somewhat different from general refuge - in terms of the object, the time, the person and the purpose.

1. The Object

Common to all kinds of Buddhist refuges are the Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha. However, the explanation of these three differs between Mahayana and general Buddhism. In Mahayana, the Buddha is the one who has unimaginable qualities and who has departed from all the faults. He is the one who possesses the three kayas, or the three bodies: the Dharmakaya, the Sambhogakaya, and the Nirmanakaya.

Dharmakaya means that His mind, which is completely purified, has become one with the ultimate truth. Where subject and object become one is “Dharmakaya.” The Sambhogakaya comes from accumulating enormous amounts of merit while still on the Path. This produces the highest form of the physical body, one that has all the qualities, and remains permanently in the highest Buddha field, known as Akanishtha, and bestows teachings to the great Bodhisattvas.

In order to help ordinary sentient beings, whenever and wherever needed, the Buddhas appear in whatever form is required. These forms are the Nirmanakaya, or in other words, emanations. The historical Shakyamuni Buddha is among the Nirmanakayas. He is called “The Excellent Nirmanakaya” because even ordinary beings can see him as a Buddha. All the Buddhas who appear in the world are Nirmanakaya forms. In this practice we take refuge in the Buddha who possesses the three kayas. This is the particular Mahayana explanation of refuge.

The Dharma, or Teaching, is the great experience that the Buddha and all the higher Bodhisattvas have achieved. Their great realisation is the Dharma. When what the Buddhas have achieved is put into words to benefit ordinary sentient beings, this is also called the Dharma.

The ones who are following the enlightenment path and who have already reached the irreversible state are the true Sangha. According to the Mahayana, this Sangha is formed by the Bodhisattvas.

The true Buddha, Dharma and Sangha, the “Triple Gem”, are the Buddhas who possess the three bodies, the Dharma which expresses their realisations and teachings, and the Sangha of Bodhisattvas. The Triple Gem is symbolically represented in the images of the Buddhas, all the books of teachings, and the ordinary Sangha of monks. Although the names of the objects of refuge are the same in the Mahayana and in the general refuge, their qualities are explained somewhat differently in the Mahayana.

2. The Time

The second distinction between the general and the Mahayana refuge has to do with time. In the general refuge, one takes the refuge for the immediate future. In the Mahayana refuge, one takes refuge from the present, extending up until the attainment of ultimate enlightenment.

3. The Person

In the general refuge, one takes refuge for oneself. In the Mahayana refuge, one takes refuge both for oneself and for all sentient beings. One imagines that all sentient beings have at one time, in previous lifetimes, been our own parents or very dear ones. One seeks refuge for the benefit of limitless sentient beings.

4. The Purpose

In the general refuge, one takes refuge to gain self-liberation. In the Mahayana, one takes refuge to attain enlightenment both for oneself and for the sake of all sentient beings.

If one understands the object, time, person, and purpose as we have described, one accomplishes the Mahayana refuge. With these qualities in mind, one should recite the refuge prayer as well as the request to the objects of refuge for them to bestow their blessings.

In addition, when actually practicing the teachings, the great Acharya Vasubandhu said that if one wants to practice Dharma, there are four requisites. These are: moral conduct, study, contemplation and meditation.

LINE ONE OF THE TEXT

Line 1 of the text is: “If you desire the worldly aims of this life, you are not a spiritual person.”

The great Jetsun Dragpa Gyaltsen explained the first line in the following way. Whatever practice you do, if your aim is for the sake of this life, it is not religion; it is not Dharma. No matter what vows you receive, no matter how much you study, no matter how much meditation you do, if it’s all for the sake of this life, it is not Dharma.

If one wishes to practice Dharma, one must begin by lessening attachment to this life. This life is temporal, it is like a mirage. Even if you think that a mirage is real water, it still will not slack your thirst. Whatever sort of moral conduct, study or meditation you undertake, if it is for the sake of this life, it will not ultimately benefit you.

To change your intention from not practising Dharma to practising Dharma, you should begin by meditating on the difficulty of obtaining this precious human life. Human life is rare compared to other forms of sentient life, because one human being’s body can contain millions of other sentient beings.

This rareness is explained in many different ways - for example from the point of view of “cause,” “numbers,” “example” and “nature.”

THE CAUSE

To receive a human life at all, and especially to receive a human life, which appears in a favourable place and with the right conditions, one must have a good cause. Such a cause must be an exceptionally virtuous one in order to lead to human birth with all the right conditions. In the three worlds, there are very few that practice the virtuous things, while there are enormous numbers of sentient beings who indulge in non-virtuous acts. So therefore, from the cause pointof-view, human life that has all the right conditions and is free from all the wrong places of birth, is very rare.

NUMBER

From the point-of-view of numbers, sentient beings in the hells, in the hungry-ghost realm, and in the animal kingdom are countless. Beings in the lower realms are as numerous as all the atoms and dust particles of this world. Compared to these, human lives are very few, especially those that have the right conditions.

EXAMPLE

The example of point-of-view is explained in the Sutras with the following illustration. Suppose the whole world is a great ocean and over this ocean floats a golden yoke, which has a small hole in it. Underneath the ocean is a blind tortoise that comes up to the surface only once every hundred years. The golden yoke floats on the surface, going wherever the wind blows it. When the wind comes from the east, it goes to the west. When the wind comes from the west it goes to the east. It clearly would be very difficult for the neck of the blind tortoise to enter the hole in the yoke under these circumstances. The chance of this happening is very rare. Human life, especially one free of all the wrong places of birth and which has all the right conditions is even more rare than this example. So from the example of point-of-view, human life is very rare.

NATURE

The human birth in which one can hear and practice the teachings requires a number of particular conditions. The “nature” of this human rebirth is explained in terms of avoiding rebirth in the “eight wrong places” and being born with the “five conditions.” The “eight wrong places” in which it is unfavourable to be reborn are the states of the hells, pretas, animals and long-life gods, as well as existence among the barbarians, or persons with wrong views. Likewise, one cannot be born where the Buddhist teachings have not been given, or with impaired faculties — such as being dumb, or mentally retarded. There are five favourable conditions for rebirth. They are, to be born in a place where the teachings have been given, and where monks and lay-precept holders are still living, not to have indulged in the five limitless sins, and to live where there is full faith in the teachings in general, and the Vinaya in particular.

One also has to be born in a time in which a Buddha has come and in which He has turned the Wheel of Dharma. The teaching must still be going on, and where there are still many people following the path, and where there are people who are readily helping you to find your right livelihood.

These circumstances all depend on and must be obtained from others. So altogether, to be free from the eight unfavourable conditions and to obtain these ten favourable circumstances is extremely rare by nature. This is not only rare, but also very precious, because through such a life — not an ordinary life, but a human life that has all the right conditions — one must be able to be free from all the sufferings of samsara. Not only that, even the most difficult and the highest aim we could aspire to, ultimate enlightenment, is also achieved through human life. Therefore, human life is extremely precious.

Not only is human life rare and precious, but even this is not enough!

We have to practise. Without practice, just obtaining this very precious opportunity will not be enough. In our past lives, it is likely that we had many, many such opportunities to practise, but which we wasted and did not reach any significant states. So, from now on, unless we practice, we will still remain in samsara. Therefore, when we have such a good opportunity and a precious life, it is very important to practice the Dharma.

The Buddha taught that everything is impermanent. The whole three worlds are like a cloud in autumn and the birth and death of sentient beings is like a dancer’s movement. A person’s life is like a light in the sky, or like a steep waterfall, which isn’t still for a single moment, but is constantly rushing down.

Even the Buddhas who have attained a permanent body must also leave their bodies in order to show impermanence to sentient beings. Therefore, there is not a single place where death will not occur. There are many more causes for death than there are causes for life. It is a common wish that death will leave us alone, but of course, all beings eventually have to face death. Everything is changing. Lives in this particular realm (our lives on the continent of “Jambudvipa”) have no fixed length. Some people die even before they are born, some die as soon as they are born, some die as babies, some die at a very young age.

Although we may have no major problems today, we never know what will happen, even within an hour. Anything can happen. Unless we practise now, if we think, “For the time being I will work on some other things, then when I get older I will practise Dharma,” we will never know whether we will get this opportunity or not. Therefore, it is very important to practise now!

At the time of death, nothing can help you, no matter how powerful one is, no matter how clever, no matter how rich one is, no matter how brave you are, nothing can help you. Even one’s body, which we have had with us right from the day we were conceived, and which we have looked after as a very precious thing, and we take great care of, and for whose sake we do all kinds of things -- even this we have to leave behind. Our own continuity of mind then has to go without any choice of freedom. The only thing that can help you at the moment of death is the Dharma practices you have learned.

If you practise Dharma, the best thing is that at the time of death, you will know the path and without any hesitation and as a matter of fact, with full confidence, you will leave your body. The person who practises Dharma has no hesitation to die, because they will have no regret of not having practised.

This precious human body and this precious human life are impermanent. The first line, “If you desire for the worldly aims of this life, you are not a spiritual person,” explains directly that whatever spiritual practice you do, if it is aimed for this life, then it is not Dharma and it will not benefit you. That’s the direct explanation. Indirectly, it explains about the difficulties of obtaining the precious human life and impermanence.

When you have the clear understanding from inside of these two things, then you will be firmly set on the path. In this sense, even if someone attempts to keep you from practising Dharma, it will not be possible for you to stop.

LINE TWO OF THE TEXT

Line two is: “If you desire further worldly existence, you haven’t the spirit of renunciation.”

If one continues to desire to be born in the human or deva realms (of course, no one wants to be born in the lower realms because the lower realms are full of suffering), the second line cuts that out. It explains that not only should the teaching that you practice not involve attachment to this present life, but also to be free from the desire for future births in the round of existence.

Not only are the lower realms full of suffering; in the higher realms also, it’s all suffering. In the three lower realms (which are the hells, hungry ghosts, and the animal kingdom), what they have is called “the suffering of suffering.” The hells have many divisions, like the hot hells, the semi-hot hells, etc. Whenever one is born among the hells, one has an unimaginable amount of suffering. Thus, what the hell beings experience is called “the suffering of suffering.”

In the hungry-ghost realm, also the beings have a tremendous amount of suffering in not finding food. They have great hunger and thirst for hundreds and hundreds of years. Even if they should find food, instead of helping their bodies, it creates more suffering.

In the animal kingdom, as we all see, animals have to suffer many things. Most animals have not a single moment of relaxation because they have so many enemies among the animals themselves. In addition, human beings are hunting and fishing and bringing all kinds of suffering to them. Generally, all animals suffer great ignorance because they don’t have any way of knowing Dharma. It is very easy for us to realise that the three lower realms are full of suffering.

The three higher realms are sometimes understood as having a mixture of happiness and suffering. However, when we carefully think about it, we can see that there is not any real happiness in the higher realms. Even in the Deva’s realm, where it appears that these beings have a wonderful life, everything is impermanent. The Devas have so much luxury in their lives that they don’t even think of practising the Dharma. All their lives are spent in enjoyment of worldly pleasures, so when they near the time of their death, they experience a particular king of suffering. For example, they have enough intelligence to be able to see where they will be reborn. And, as they have spent all their lives in enjoyment, many of them will be reborn in the lower realms. Since they can know these things, the Devas experience mental suffering greater than the physical suffering of the lower realms. Even the very great Devas, like Indra, the lord of the Devas, may be reborn as a very ordinary servant. And even the great Devas whose bodies can illuminate the whole world, after death, will be reborn in complete darkness in which they won’t be able to see their own hand before their face.

In the human realm, as we have seen, everything is changing. Great emperors become very ordinary people and the very rich find themselves very poor. Generally, everyone is bound to encounter the four great mountains of suffering: death, old age, sickness, and birth. There are many, many sufferings, like always having fear of meeting enemies and always the fear of departing from your friends. Things you wish not to happen come true and things you don’t want come to you. There are unimaginable amounts of suffering which are mostly of the kind called “the suffering of change.”

We suffer for the very reason that everything is constantly changing. In the asuras’ or demi-gods’ realm, since they experience great hate and jealously towards the heaven realm, they meet with great suffering in their life. So the devas, the humans, and the asuras all experience the suffering of change.

Next is “the suffering of aggregates,” which covers the whole universe. Each of us will undertake work that we will never finish. Our lives are full of continuous effort. Our actions are never finished. In this great, busy, worldly life of activities, one day we have to die without finishing this work.

Everybody has to die in the midst of life. Therefore, no matter where one is reborn, whether in the lower realms or in the higher realms, both are full of suffering. For example, if poison is mixed with food -- whether it is good food or bad food makes no difference — one cannot eat it. In the same way, no matter where one is born, either in the higher realms or in the lower realms, as long as it is within the round of existence, one will experience suffering.

Related to this is the explanation of the law of karma. We are forced to ask why the sufferings we experience happen in the first place. Each thing must have an associated cause. All kinds of suffering are created by non-virtuous actions. A non-virtuous action is any action that is created by desire, hatred, or ignorance. Killing, sexual misconduct, and stealing are the three bodily actions which are non-virtuous.

Then also, there is lying, schism, harsh words, and idle talk, which are the four non-virtuous actions of voice. One commits these non-virtuous deeds through one’s own speech.

Envy, hatred, and wrong view are the three non-virtuous actions of mind.

Roughly speaking, all the non-virtuous actions are included in these ten actions. When one indulges in the ten non-virtuous actions, not only will one have to face terrible consequences, but even after facing the consequences, one will have continuous bad results. In other words, all the bad things that are happening in this life are also created by our own non-virtuous actions, which we have committed in our previous lives.

The ten virtuous actions (freedom from hatred, desire, and ignorance) are the opposite of the ten non-virtuous deeds. Not only do the ten virtuous actions give wonderful results temporarily, they do so as well for many future lifetimes. In other words, all the good things that are happening in our life are created by our own virtuous deeds that we have carried out in our previous lives. Finally, by practising continuous virtuous deeds, self-liberation, or even the ultimate enlightenment, may be attained. There are also indifferent or neutral actions, such as walking and sleeping.

Although neutral actions do not produce any suffering (and from that point of view, they are very good), since they do not produce any virtuous result, they are a sort of waste. It is important to transform these indifferent actions into virtuous deeds. For example, when you are walking you should think, “May all gain from the path of liberation.” When you meet people, you should think, “May all sentient beings meet virtuous friends.” And when you are eating, you should have the intent of feeding the enormous amount of germs that live in your body.

All our indifferent actions should thus be transformed into virtuous deeds.

The sufferings of samsara and the suffering of the round of existence and the law or karma, or law of cause and effect, is explained by the second line of this teaching, “If you desire further worldly existence, you haven’t got the spirit of renunciation.”

By meditating on two things — concentrating on the suffering of the round of existence and the law of karma - you will both turn away from clinging to the round of existence, and come to the realisation that the round of existence is full of suffering. In order to be free from suffering, one must consider this world as if it were a great fire, or like a nest of poisonous snakes.

As we meditate on this teaching we will begin to develop a real inner urge to put these principles into practice. For example, many yogis concentrate on the sufferings of samsara until they have the same feeling as a prisoner has. Namely, they develop the single thought: “When can I escape?” Until you have developed this attitude, you should meditate on the suffering of samsara.

Unless we really understand the sufferings of samsara, we will not practise Dharma. In this sense, suffering is a great help in the practice of the path.

When Lord Buddha first turned the wheel of Dharma in Sarnath, one of the first things He said was that one must know suffering. The first Noble Truth is that one must know suffering. If you think carefully about this, you won’t be able to waste time for very long.

This concludes the explanation of the sufferings of samsara and the law of karma.

LINE THREE OF THE TEXT

Line three is: “If you desire liberation for the sake of yourself, you haven’t the enlightened attitude.”

If we truly understand that the world is full of suffering, and believe that we are able to free ourselves by practising virtuous deeds, we can actually attain self-liberation. However, self-liberation does not fully accomplish one’s own purpose, and it cannot help other sentient beings. As a matter of fact, self-liberation is a great obstacle to attaining ultimate enlightenment because it delays the actual ultimate enlightenment. It is very important right from the beginning to set out to achieve the highest aim, which is to attain ultimate enlightenment for the sake of all sentient beings. This ultimate enlightenment must arise from the right causes and conditions. The main cause is great compassion, the root is Bodhicitta, and the condition is skillful means.

Although every sentient being wishes to be free from suffering and wants to have happiness, due to ignorance, they can never have these. In this sense it is wrong to aim to be free from suffering for oneself. We have to think of all other sentient beings. But we are unable to help them at this moment because our defilements and delusions bind us. So, the only thing that can help is to attain ultimate enlightenment - so that we will actually be able to help others.

To attain ultimate enlightenment, one has to have the right causes. The first is to meditate on love and compassion. “Love” means that you wish every sentient being to be happy and to have the cause of happiness. This wish must be directed to all sentient beings without any discrimination.

Since we cannot produce these thoughts toward all sentient beings at the beginning of our practice, we proceed gradually. We begin by meditating on love and compassion towards whomever is dearest to us, for example, our own mother. One begins by visualising in front of you, your own mother or anyone who is dear to you. Then, remember all the kindness they have done for you.

For example, if it is your own mother, consider that she gave birth to you, brought you up in life with a kind, loving eye, gave you so much love and took care of you. Although now she is aiming for happiness herself, due to ignorance, she cannot have happiness. She is in the midst of suffering and she is even causing more suffering. Therefore, you should wish that she be free and be happy and have the cause of happiness. And so you pray, “May she be happy and have the cause of happiness of the Guru and Triple Gem.”

Later, you should gradually increase this visualisation to include your relatives and so forth. Finally, include more difficult individual, such as people you dislike and your enemies. You visualise your enemy right in front of you and think that, although in this life he appears in the form of the enemy, in actual fact, in many lifetimes he has been my very kind mother and father, as well as relatives and friends. He has given so much love and compassion and so much care has been given to me. But now we have changed our lives and since I did not repay his own kindness to him, today he comes in the form of my enemy to take all the kindness he has given. Today we have changed our lives; we do not recognise each other, so therefore, we must create the thought, “May he be happy and have the cause of happiness.” And then gradually you expand this meditation until you can have the same thought towards all sentient beings.

When one is well trained in this meditation of love, one can also use it to increase feelings of compassion. First, whoever is dearest to you, you visualise and think, “Although this person wants happiness, due to ignorance, he is in the midst of suffering. Due to ignorance, he is making more suffering for himself. May he now be free from suffering and may he be free from the cause of suffering.”

And in the same way, later you should try to extend this meditation to the point that you have the same thought for all beings without discrimination.

When you are well advanced in this meditation, it is important to practice “Tong Len.” In this practice we visualise that all the happiness and the causes of happiness (that is, the virtuous deeds one has), are given, without hesitation, to all sentient beings. And the suffering of all sentient beings as well as their cause of sufferings, come to oneself, visualised like a great mass of dirt. This “exchanging meditation” is, of course, of great benefit.

When one is well versed in this, then one practices the Six Paramitas and the four collecting things which we have in the main path of a Bodhisattva.

With this we have completed the first three lines, which explains the method side of all the different paths.

LINE FOUR OF THE TEXT

Line four is: “If you grasp at the view of ultimate reality, you haven’t got the right view.”

The fourth line deals with view. Even if relative Bodhicitta, the relative enlightenment-thought has arisen well within your mind, if one still has clinging to all things as reality, then one will fall into the error of the permanent and the impermanent. Therefore, one will fall into the extremes of existence and nonexistence. Due to this, one will not be free from the sufferings of samsara. To really be free, it is very important to keep away from clinging to the belief that this life is real. The antidote for this deluded belief is concentration and insight-wisdom.

Concentration is necessary because our minds are focused on distractions and outer objects. It is really important to do concentration meditations, because without proper concentration, one will not be able to attain insight-wisdom. Before one can meditate on insight-wisdom a strong base first must be built. The base for insight wisdom is concentration.

Concentration should be done in a secluded place, away from distractions, sitting in full-lotus position, or half-lotus position. First, you do recite the refuge prayer and create the enlightenment thought. Then you should assume the full meditation position, sitting straight. One should concentrate first on any outer object, preferably an image of Buddha. In this way you are remembering the Buddha, which in itself has a tremendous amount of power.

You visualise the Buddha’s image in front of you on a jewelled throne, golden colored with his right hand in the earth-touching mudra, and his left hand in his lap in the meditation position. He is wearing the full robes and sitting in the full-lotus position. Concentrate on this general image of the Buddha and the specific parts of the body as well. Or, you can meditate on some other Buddha form, like Buddha Amitabha or other deities. Try to concentrate on this.

In the beginning, it will seem that you have many thoughts, but in fact this is actually what is happening all the time. Normally, since you follow your thoughts , you don’t notice it. In the meantime, when thoughts come, instead of going after the thoughts, you just concentrate. You turn back and concentrate on the image for a long period of time. As you develop, your thoughts will decrease, and you will be able to remain on the same object for a long period of time. Then, after a while, you will be able to concentrate on the image for a very long period of time. When that happens, it is a sign that your concentration is now strong enough to be able to meditate on insight-wisdom.

Concentration alone will not do anything, apart from keeping away distractions. It will not take away the deep roots of the defilements.

To take away the deep root of the defilements, insight-wisdom is necessary. In Tibetan, the word for insight-wisdom is “lhag-tong” (lhag mthong). This means that, when you examine the outer and inner dharmas -- the true nature of all things - through wisdom, then, you are able to see something completely different. Lhag means “extra” and tong is “to see.” So, it means to see something extraordinary. You see completely beyond existing and non-existing; you have completely gone beyond the two extremes.

The concentration was method and the actual thing was insight-wisdom. When you managed to meditate on the insight-wisdom instead of concentrating on an outer object, you concentrate on the actual thing.

Before one meditates, of course, it is necessary to explain a lot of things. First of all, all the different visions that we see, in other words, animate and inanimate — all the things that we see. Ordinary people don’t think, “Why do all these things appear?” or, “Why must we have these?” They simply just accept things as they are. A person with greater intelligence will try to concentrate on these ideas. Through their intelligence, they are able to examine the true nature of all things: For example, questions such as “why we are born like this”, or “why do we see all these different visions”, “why do people have different visions, why do people have different feelings”, and so forth.

In the past, when meditators examined these questions and tried to discover the true nature of all things, they all came to different conclusions. For example, that all of existence is created by Brahma or so forth and so on, according to the different schools of Indian philosophy.

Briefly speaking, there are four different Buddhist schools: two of the Hinayana and two of the Mahayana. Beginning with the Hinayana schools, the first is the Sarvastivadins or Vaibahashikas. When they examined these questions, they came to the conclusion that everything that we see is not existing as we take it to be, but the atoms of these are existing.

For instance, for them, a table is a relative truth. They assert that a table is made of huge numbers of atoms put together in a particular shape and named “table.” So the table is relative, because when you examine it, you don’t find “table” anywhere — it is just hundreds of atoms. But, when they examined the atom itself, the tiniest atom they could not divide anymore, they held it to existing absolutely. Thus, the belief of the Vaibhashika, or lowest Hinayana school, is that the table is relative truth and the atoms of the table are absolute truth.

Higher than this is the view of the Hinayana school called the Sautrantika. They think that all the outer visions are the same as held by the Sarvastivadins. In addition, they hold that the outer object, the organ of the eye, and the consciousness of the eye — these three things meet together. Then in the second moment, the eye, so to speak, takes a picture of that outer object. Finally, all you can see is the picture which has been taken by your mind. They held that as the truth.

Then, as thinking about these questions developed further in the Mahayana, there emerged two schools, the Vijnanavada and the Madhyamika. In the Vijnanavada, it is held that all this is not true — that all this is not existing outside, but is all our own projection: It is all projected by our mind. Everything is mind. Nobody has created what we perceive, only our own mind has created these things. For that reason, for sentient beings, a certain place is a very happy place, while for certain people, it is a very miserable place. So, it is all our own projection — there is nothing of the outer object — it is all projected (in other words, manifested) from our own mind. All this is the relative truth, but the mind exists absolutely.

Even higher than this view is the Madhyamika, which was founded by the great Guru, Nagarjuna. The Lord Buddha himself prophesied that after his passing away, there would be a bhikshu named Naga, and only he would be able to find the hidden meaning of all the Prajnaparamita Sutras. As Buddha prophesied, Nagarjuna came, and when he examined things, he could not find anything, because to hold that the mind itself is existing is not right:

The mind is subject and things are object. Subject and object are depending on each other. If there is no object, there cannot be a subject. So the mind, also, is not existing. But, he accepts everything relatively — without examining things — the way ordinary people take them to be, as in the form of illusions. But in reality, the Madhyamikas’ view is that you cannot find any conclusion such as “Mind is existing.” He could not say anything. The true nature of everything is completely removed from the dual vision. For example, it is just like a dream. In the dream, we see many happy things or we see many sufferings, but when you awake from your dream, you don’t find them anymore. All the things you saw in your dream are gone, and you don’t know where it came from and where it has gone or where it is staying. In the same way, the present vision is like a very long dream. Only this dream has very firm propensities, so therefore, we think of it in terms of being very real. In reality, all the Buddhas and Bodhisattvas see that this is just like a dream. When you attain enlightenment, it is just like awakening from your dream. Therefore, all the visions that you see are just like reflections in a mirror.

Until you have a real firm understanding, you should try to think that all things are not real. This is what we call the vision and the void seen non-dually. Relatively, with all the things that you see, the vision doesn’t cease — you can see all the time. When you try to examine with the sharp reasoning of absolute truth, then you cannot find anything which is independently existing. You should try to meditate until you attain a definite understanding of this.

Finally, you mix together concentration and insight-wisdom, and try to think that all the things that were explained are realised as shunyata.

In reality, there is no object “shunyata” and no subject “mind” which realised shunyata. The true nature of all things is completely merged, just as water is merged with water and completely becomes one. By doing meditation in this way, your mind will completely turn away from the clinging to the present vision as real and realise that this is all illusion. All these illusions will gradually turn away. And then, as you go on, you will be able to realise the real ultimate truth. By realising the ultimate truth, then, of course, you depart from all the defilements and are awakened from all illusions.

At the off-time of meditation, due to your understanding of shunyata, you understand that sentient beings who do not realise this shunyata have to suffer a great deal. With that in mind, you are able to generate great compassion. Through the practice of great compassion and the understanding of shunyata, — “just as the bird in the sky needs two wings” — , with the method, compassion, and the wisdom (shunyata), one will be able to cross the suffering of samsara. One will be able to attain ultimate enlightenment. In the ultimate enlightenment, through wisdom you attain the dharmakaya, which accomplishes your tasks, and through the practice of compassion you will be able to liberate others. In that way , you attain the Rupakaya and benefit countless sentient beings forever. So with this, we have completed the whole four lines of the Zhenpa Zhidel.


The Buddha taught us that all difficulties and suffering come as a result of selfishness. All happiness comes from the result of; wishing happiness for others, loving kindness, and good behaviour, which are qualities of a good human being. 

-- Dagyab Rinpoche

Monday, 3 September 2018

人生八苦

大安法师

无量劫以来,我们一念无明,迷惑颠倒,造诸恶业,轮转六道,很难发起出离心。所以,必须要激活!要把它激发起来,激发我们的出离心,鼓扬我们的欣慕之心!这个激发还有折伏和摄受两种方法,折摄并运。释迦牟尼佛就像悲父在给我们讲这个世间五恶五痛五烧,那种种的不如意,种种的罪恶剧苦,我们在其中勤身营务。

我们是什么样的生存状态?《佛说无量寿经》后半部,就是我们娑婆世界苦难的非常淋漓尽致的描述。前面介绍西方极乐世界无尽的庄严,后面介绍娑婆世界五恶五痛五烧,这两个经文摆在一起一看呢,哎呀!西方极乐世界是清凉池呀!西方极乐世界才是清净,美好的故园啊!这里是大火聚呀!这里是茅坑啊!是牢狱啊!是火宅啊!这样才把它激活起来!

那么我们再来具体地展开,这种激活要来自于我们领会它,要智慧地观照它,我们凡夫众生没有智慧就在于,我们在生活的现象表层被那些虚幻的东西迷惑了,欺骗了,不了解事情的真相。为什么释迦牟尼佛首先要讲四谛法,苦谛?我们每个人都生活在苦难当中,但是意识不到自己的苦,这就是一个迷惑颠倒,能够意识到我们在苦中,这就有点智慧,就是苦谛了。但往往大多数人不能意识到,尤其在现在的市场经济,这种物质文明比较发达的时候,他天天感觉很满足啊!

我去年碰到一个小老板,吃得胖乎乎的,穿的是很名牌的衣服,红光满面。他就问我一个问题啊,他问佛教讲苦海无边,我觉得很快乐啊,什么叫苦海无边?不认识事情的真相,那么这就需要深遂的智慧,才能够透过这个虚幻的,所谓的快乐的这种假相,了解生命本身的苦难感。

释迦牟尼佛作为一个太子,他为什么要出家?就是由于生老病死本体上的苦难,他不能释怀呀,即便是贵为天子,富有天下,也不能解决这个问题,所以他不能安心,他要解决生命当中最本体的问题,他要出家,也要令一切众生离开这种八苦!因此,我们要常常智慧地观照这个世间的苦,然后欣求西方极乐世界的乐,要不断地把佛经里面的净土五经来熏习自己。无问自说的净土法门体现了诸佛如来度化众生,出离生死苦海的最极悲心哪!

很多经典都是有问而说,唯有念佛法门是无问自说。为什么众生问不出来?梦都梦不到嘛!然而这个法门又能彻底地给予众生究竟离生死苦得涅槃乐之大利,所以看到众生能够信受,根机成熟,赶紧去说啊!为诸众生做不请之友呀,惠以众生真实之利啊!

透过释迦牟尼佛对我们的宣说,我们把两土的状态作个比较,那真的是稍有点理智,都会有一个毫不踌躇的抉择了。我们就从这世间的八苦来简单地谈一谈,这个八苦不管你是帝王将相,还是贩夫走卒,都同样地要经受。

这个世间我们有生苦,出生本身就是一种苦啊。我们是带着一念无明妄动,带着那种贪欲的心在中阴阶段啊。看到有缘的父母这种交合他就投过来呀,投过来他有一个自居的作用。弗洛伊德讲自居,如果对男根感兴趣,他就会本能地排斥他的母亲,自居一个角色!这样他就会变成一个女婴,投胎为女的。如果他对女根感兴趣,他就会本能地排斥他的父亲,自居一个角色,成为一个男孩。然后父母精血混在一起,他的阿赖耶识搅在一起就入胎,在母体里面,在生脏和熟脏之间,那是天天跟屎尿待在一起呀。

然后吸母体的四大地水火风来长养他的六根啊,这个过程都是很苦啊!它待在一个很阴暗的地方,就像牢狱一样,叫胎狱呀!当母亲吃点硬的东西下去的时候就像高山压下来一样啊,当一杯冰水喝下去的时候就是寒冰地狱一样啊!他是遭受这样的苦难。然后在十月怀胎成熟,就从狭窄的产道出来,倒悬之苦呀,一出来他是带着那种哭声来到这个世界的。风吹过来在皮肤上,那是像刀割一样的,这种生苦啊,现在我们都忘了!那么如果往生西方极乐世界就离开了这个生苦啊!就不是由淫欲的烦恼去投生的,而是由念佛的愿力去的。阿弥陀佛正觉的果地,赐给我们的莲华,这个莲华代表在我们烦恼的淤泥当中开显的如来正觉,九品莲华为父母,是化生啊,莲华的化生啊!不是胎生啊!所以往生西方极乐世界就离开了生苦。但在三界六道当中,这种生的苦是一轮又一轮,今生是一个人胎的苦还好一点,下辈子可能到马胎,牛胎,驴胎里面去了,那就更苦不堪言了。

在这个世间,衰老是一个苦。我们的念头,念念的迁移生灭,就有时间的概念,这个时间是建立在我们的念头当中的。有一念过去了就是过去,当下这一念是现在,即将要来的那一念是未来,这叫过去、现在、未来三际。但是这个念头是虚幻的,所以这个时间的观念也是虚幻的,在百法当中称为心不相应行法。爱因斯坦的相对论也告诉我们,时间是虚幻的,是为了解释一种事情的工具手段而已,不是客观物理世界的真相。但是我们在这种八识的妄心当中,念念在迁移,就必然要衰老,感受老苦。

你看看那些,在大街上的老人。前几天我们也到安养院看了一下,那是颤颤巍巍啊!新陈代谢呀,免疫系统呀下降!种种疾病呢!吃饭都吃不下去呀,牙都脱落了啊!那么这个时候,他又是很孤独啊!老了如果没有种信仰,很孤独啊!天天盼望他的子女来看他,那个子女现在自己都忙不过来啊!不来啊!寂寞,于是跟别人谈话,谈什么呢?那只有回味他似乎辉煌的过去呀!我当年怎么样,我当年怎么样,但是你老是讲当年,谁爱听呢?那不爱听,他也得唠叨呀!所以年轻人最怕老年人的唠叨啊!但是这要注意,年轻人应该体会老年人,自己也会老,所以要宽容,理解老年人的唠叨,你给他充实,给他尊重。

从现代心理学来看,一个年老的人如果没有一种精神寄托,没有宗教信仰,他是很可怜的。如果他有一种信仰,他能够念阿弥陀佛,那他就很自在,子女看不看他就无所谓,他还希望你不看他,你看他还耽误他念佛啊!那如果说不念佛,他天天到大街上,就坐在大街上看过往的行人,看过往的车辆,看得满面尘埃,他呆呆地在那看着,你看可怜不可怜。老苦,老态龙钟人都不喜欢,我们都要经过这个过程。

病苦,我们有地水火风四大的身躯,这就像箧中的四条毒蛇啊!我们如何侍候它,这个蛇都会背恩小人呢!你给它咬一口,就不行了。有一大失调,一百零一种病就起来了。所以,我们每个人都有生病的体验呢,一生病就灰心呢,一发高烧就像在地狱一样的很不舒服。现在大家真是怕生病,但是又不得不面临这个生病。

西方极乐世界就没有这些啊!在西方净土,它离开了这种生灭的心,它没有春夏秋冬季节的迁移呀!他不会衰老!他是金刚那罗延身,不会衰老!这个西方极乐世界往生者,他的身体构成,不再是像我们这样的血肉之躯。类似光与磁的整合,所谓清虚之身,无极之体啊。他就没有我们身体那么多细菌啊,病毒啊,这些东西,他不会生病啊!那在西方极乐世界不存在医疗保险问题啊!也不需要这么多大夫啊!所以离开了老苦,离开了病苦。

我们这个世间还要面临一个,可能大家最不愿意面对,但必须面对的问题——死亡!死苦啊!一切有生命的众生都是贪生怕死的!好死不如歹活啊!花再多的钱,哪怕维持一个小时,一分钟的生命也在所不辞啊!所以生病生到最后,即便是绝症,也要输血,也要全身插满管子,拿着氧气袋!为什么?他有一个对生命的渴望,不想离开这个世间,但又必须离开这个世间,这时候他的痛苦就像生龟脱壳啊!那样的痛苦啊!再加上如果不信因果,没有修行,死后到哪去,他是一片茫然,一片黑暗,恐惧呀!就是所谓彻底的无神论者,在这个时候他也害怕啊!但是很多人对这个事情由于太害怕,太不想死,所以他就回避这个问题。

很少有人谈论死亡的问题,一谈,他即便看到了很多的死亡,他都认为这是别人的事,跟他无关,他不会死。他哪怕活到九十多岁,你祝贺他,哎呀,祝你长命百岁呀!他会不高兴,你怎么让我早死啊!所以对生命的执著、留恋,但又必须要走,他很苦!然而这种生命的,最渴望生命的一切宗教,追求永生啊!道家也追求长生不老啊!羽化升天啊!基督教也是要永生啊!然而其他的宗教想达到这个,面对死亡,要超越它,很难,但如果到了西方极乐世界,你就是无量寿了,这种不可说不可说的阿僧祇劫,永远不会死亡啊!一生补处菩萨啊,寿命跟阿弥陀佛等同啊!

为什么他们是无量寿?因为他契证了心体。有生有灭就有时间,有时间必然会有衰老死亡啊!你就是修仙道修到了天仙,地仙,哪怕修禅定修到非想非非想定,你那个微细的生灭的心,还没有坐断啊!还会堕入轮回里面啊!就像鱼被冰冻了一样,但是这个冰化了,它又活过来了。这些都不能解决问题的,唯有契证到不生不灭的涅槃,它才真正是无量寿。这就是涅槃常乐我净的常,超越了时间的一种性德!西方极乐世界,阿弥陀佛慈悲愿力加持令我们离开了死亡,无量寿,那么在这一期的生命当中,我们一定要每天想到死这个问题!不能像一般不修行的人一样,回避这个问题,实行鸵鸟政策,这是不能的。

念佛行人直接解决的就是这个问题,死这个问题,就是学这个死,每天要遭遇这个死!每天要想到我对这个死解决了没有?!这一期业报身的死,是我们西方净土莲华化生,法身慧命诞生的开端。在净土法门叫文成印坏,文就是我们念佛往生的那个净土生因啊!就是莲华化生的这种文成啊!就在文成的当下,在这个娑婆世界的业报身就消失了。

临命终时阿弥陀佛现前拿着莲华接引就是我们净土的生因,当我们在莲华上诞生的时候,我们娑婆世界这个五蕴身相,如蜡印,这个印章是蜡做的,蜡印印泥进去的时候,这个蜡就成为印的组成部分,一烧之后,蜡熔化掉了,印文就同时现前,没有一个间隔,这就叫文成印坏。一到西方净土就得到无量寿,解决了这个世间的死亡问题,这叫做死生。当我们了解了这个真相,一个念佛行人他是很坦然、很愉快地面对这个死亡,他不会恐惧。

所以古往今来有许多的念佛人,临命终时是带着非常灿烂的笑容,离开这个世间的。远离一切恐惧、不安,他是带着欢喜、喜悦。你看临命终时他看到阿弥陀佛现前,那种愉快、那种发自内心的欢喜的笑容,世间还有什么表情能够比得上?我们说这个世间讲临终关怀,净土法门,阿弥陀佛给予我们的名号以及西方极乐世界安立之所,这是最伟大、最安乐的临终关怀啊!我们要把这个临终关怀传达给众生,让他有一个归宿。哪怕他临命终时,得了绝症,一般来说是非常痛苦的时候,如果你给他传达阿弥陀佛慈悲愿力,让他念佛,他能够安住在这个佛号当中,这种疼痛都会大为地下降。

这方面的例子是很多的,他有一种很强的镇定,止痛的作用。也确实得问问,痛的是什么?其实有一个不痛的东西嘛,痛的还是我们虚妄的心嘛。如果我们把真心全部放在阿弥陀佛名号当中,身体本身是一个臭皮囊啊,是假的东西啊。你把这个身体跟这个感受疼痛的心分离,你就自在了嘛,八苦交煎也无妨。你看现在那个印度教的信徒,为什么他修一些苦行?用什么这个很尖锐的东西通过身体的部位,或者用钩子钩住自己的肌肉,这样的做。其实他也是一个心性上的训练,要训练到这种感知系统跟身体要有一定程度上的分离,他就不会有疼痛嘛,他就很自在。实际上他是可以分离的。

死亡的问题一定要每天提起来。印祖说过,净业行人念念不忘这个死字,则道业自成。我们不要回避它,也确实不能回避它。佛陀在世的时候,曾经有一次问他的弟子们,人命有多长?有弟子说,只有几天,佛说,子未知道;有弟子说,在一顿饭的时间,佛说,子未知道;最后一个弟子说,生命在呼吸间,佛肯定,就是这个。生命就在呼吸间哪,一口气不来就成隔世。我们是每天遭遇死亡,每时每刻遭遇死亡。一方面是我们自身的业力,忽然得一个疾病,染上一个疾疫,甚至晚上来一个猝死,心脏停止跳动,蹦的一下就不跳了。

这是指我们的身体上的业障,再看看自然灾害,这也不是我们所能预料的啊。这种印尼几个国家的海啸,一旦几十米的大浪一来,就把这个船啦房子啦等等全部吞噬。新加坡也处在这个边缘地带呀,大家有没有想到很危险哪?如果这个海啸一卷,新加坡这个弹丸之地,还没有反应过来,就到了鱼的腹中去了,是不是?所以我们想到这个,才会感觉到生命的紧迫感啦,忧患意识呀,不能泛泛悠悠呀,不能认为我还有多长时间,我可以活个八十、九十,可以寿终正寝的。

这种对生命,对无常,对苦难的觉知,我们是很迟钝的。在《妙法莲华经》里面,佛陀告诉我们,用火宅喻呀,三界火宅啊,众苦充满呀,甚可怖畏啊。在这个大富长者看来,这间房子里面已经是腐朽了,随时可能倒塌,同时外面火已经生起来了。然而大富长者的一群孩子们还在里面玩耍呀,屋子里面也是脏不拉唧,有各种毒蛇、蝎子呀、猛兽呀,可是这些孩子还在那里很快乐。大富长者叫他们赶快出来,他们不理睬,我在这里很快乐,为什么我要出去?因为他们不了解外面已经是燃起了大火,那个整个房子的柱子都已经是蛀空了,随时可能倒塌。

他们没有这种危机感啦,他们不了解啊,但是大富长者在外面看得很清楚,心急如焚,里面都是自己的孩子呀,必须让他们出来呀。所以他就快速地到火宅里面劝化大家赶快出来,但还是不听话呀,不听话。这个大富长者知道这些孩子心里在想什么,有什么样的渴望要求,知道他们喜欢玩羊车,玩鹿车,玩牛车,就在外面说,你们赶快出来呀,我这里有羊车给你玩啦,有鹿车给你玩啦,有牛车给你玩啦。这些孩子一听,小孩子听到有羊车鹿车牛都是很喜欢的呀,就赶紧从房子里面跑出来了,跑了出来。这个大富长者坐在十字路口,看到孩子们出来了才放心了。不管怎么样是出来了,出来了不是给他羊车鹿车,而是给他出乎意料之外的大白牛车呀。循循善诱啊,大悲菩萨,惊入火宅之门来告诉我们,这个世间不容一刻的停留啊。

然而我们不知道这个真相,善导大师也是苦口婆心哪,“归去来,魔乡不可停,旷劫来流转,六道尽皆经,到处无余乐,唯闻愁叹声,毕此生平后,入彼涅槃城。”归去来呀,赶紧要回去呀,流浪得太久了!这个世间是什么?——是魔乡,魔的家乡啊,波旬主宰的地方。魔乡不可停留,现在你看看我们这个世间是不是群魔乱舞?魔有很多的干将。他把这个,像淫欲,瞋恨、嫉妒、虚荣、斗争,这个懒惰、放逸,骄慢,怀疑,这些都是魔的干将。现在我们有几个人脱离了魔的手掌啊?现在正是魔王波旬高唱凯歌的时候,在那里你看看,大家都在魔的范围当中,谁能出得去呀?

要从魔掌当中跳出来,就得南无阿弥陀佛,魔乡不可停。无量劫以来,我们在三界六道当中轮回得很久。天堂我们待过,人间也待过,地狱也待过,等等,六道里面都待过。听到的,处处都是哀叹,忧愁的声音,不快乐。现在我们试问一下我们生活在这种所谓的物质高消费时代,我们有幸福感吗?

在大陆,曾经有一位记者采访中关村的几位富豪,问他们对生活的感受,结果结论是没有一个感觉到幸福。有些大企业家跟我交谈的时候,常会感叹活得很不开心,尽管有很多的钱,大陆有句话,有的人就是穷得只有钱。然而他对幸福内涵的诠释是,觉得幸福就是干自己想干的事,见自己想见的人,说自己想说的话,就这么简单然而都不可得啊。人在江湖,身不由己。要见不想见的人,说不想说的话,干不想干的事,有何快乐可言?唯闻愁叹声。然而今生幸闻净土念佛法门,我们要尽这一生解决苦难的轮回问题,到达西方极乐世界涅槃城。

念佛法门单刀直入,就是解决生死问题的,人生大事就是生死问题,但是这个话很难说呀,也很难把这个生死问题提到这样的高度啊。人在这种轮回五欲六尘待久了,他不容易把生死问题提到人生至高无上的地位来解决它。而且有一尊佛为了解决这个问题,早已为我们做好了帮助啊,加持啊。昨天我们去参观原貌馆,我们南洋一带早期来新加坡的,这些人的生活,真的是很辛苦啊,很艰苦,这是华人来到海外的辛酸历史啊。

在晚清,由于我们国势的衰微,我们的国民都不能在本土很好地生活,不具备安居乐业的条件,才飘荡到海外去谋生哪,九死一生,那种生活是艰难的,是那种状态。但是,生活在那个时候状态的人,又有几个生出出离心呢?又有几个听闻到阿弥陀佛慈悲的呼唤:回来吧、回来吧,浪迹天涯的游子,你不能再这样流浪下去了!很难听闻,也难信受,所以就宁可窝在一个非常非常阴暗的角落里面,真的是毫无尊严地活着,这种信心很难出得来。

印光大师早年在北京一个寺院住的时候,他有一天出来散步,碰到一个乞丐,大概十五六岁。印光大师就诱导他,你念一句佛号,我给你一文钱,那个乞丐不念。印光大师说,你念十句佛号我给你十文钱,不念。印祖这个时候悲心上来了,就把钱袋拿出来给他看(约有四百多钱),说你只要念一句佛号,就给你一钱,尽管念,整袋钱给完为止,那个乞丐在这个时候还是不念。不仅不念,还哇的一下哭起来了,因此印光大师还是给了他一文钱,离开了。

印祖通过这个事情说了一句很感慨的,“太无善根”,你就给他送一堆钱,他都不念啊。我们是多么地业障深重啊,所以我们要在这种情况下真正把出离心生起来啊。我们在座的诸位,这段时间生活比较好一点,但是石火电光呀。今生不一定靠得住,下一辈就更没有把握,下一辈到哪去呀?早期来南洋的那批人毕竟还是个人身哪,不错呀,下辈子说不准人身都保不住。赶紧求出离,到西方极乐世界是无量寿啊。

再看爱别离苦,每个人都有一份爱呀,亲情的爱,夫妻的爱,子女的爱,但是往往亲人总会离别啊。战乱的时候,或者求职,生存的压力等等。这种分离,这时候苦啊,不想离开,但愿朝朝暮暮啊。可是人隔天涯,就像牛郎织女那样子,他很苦啊,爱别离苦。

怨憎会苦,最不想见的人,最讨厌的人还就天天见面,嗨,冤家路窄!实际上,这是符合生命法则的,冤家一定要路窄的,如果你的冤家对头,他在美国,而你在新加坡,不见面哪能成为冤家呢?一定跟你做同事,做夫妻,做父子,做姊妹,做邻居,天天要进行交往,就是跟你过不去,那为什么呢?因为你欠了他的,上一辈子,宿世,或者欠了他的命债,或是欠了他的钱财,或者欠他的感情,或者欠了什么,反正一定要碰面,才能了脱这个债务关系嘛。

所以你就觉得很难受啊,但很难受你要作还债想啊,要善于化解这个冤家对头,化怨憎为善缘。你不能今生再雪上加霜,他怎么又对不起我,我要更怎么样,那你不是怨上加怨哪?!作还债想,冤家对头,哎呀,自己找个丈夫,怎么吃喝,这么好吃懒做,都让我辛辛苦苦去赚钱养活他,你就应该养活他,因为你欠了他的嘛,就心平气和了一点。

这个儿子不争气,用了我很多钱,自己赚了很多钱也不给我一分,这也是正常的啊,你欠了他的啊,作还债想。然而,西方极乐世界没有冤家对头啊,都是诸上善人俱会一处啊,相互见了生欢喜心哪,相互赞叹哪,互相帮助,他们有同体之感啦,没有我的意识,和我占有的东西啊。大家见了是非常地欢喜,离开了怨憎会苦。

西方极乐世界也没有父母,妻子,子女,所以他也没有爱别离苦,都是道友嘛,道友都是有智慧嘛。你今天在西方极乐世界,马上你要到他方世界,上成佛道,下化众生,这种离别没有关系呀,他不会有痛苦感,他没有感情上的东西呀。现在人痛苦就痛苦在感情啊,这样把人害死啊。特别是恋爱中的男女,好像他整个的世界都是对方啊,所以恋爱是最欺骗人的。

哎呀,我爱他呀,他是多么地崇高,我是多么地渺小啊,这种分泌化学物质的要素把对方完全美化,对方越美化,自己越渺小。对方不爱我了,完了,我整个世界都完蛋了。那怎么办?自杀吧。这种感情哪,我们不要被它给欺骗了!西方极乐世界化解了这种情执,并且把这种感情变成了一种慈悲啊,用智慧来化解,所以离开了爱别离苦,怨憎会苦。

这个世间有求不得苦啊!我们想一想,由于我们有欲望,对外部世界有种种的追求啊,然而无论我们如何地刻苦,如何地奋斗,我们终有在某个岗位上不能再获得欲望满足的时候,于是就感觉苦啊。而且人的欲望永无止境啦!当你赚到了十万的时候,看到别人有一百万,想追求一百万,自己有一百万的时候,人家还有一个亿啊,当你有一个亿的时候,人家还有三百个亿,当你有三百个亿的时候,觉得自己还没有到排行榜上的前十名呢。

原来都没有房子住,比较困难,现在有一个三居室,那还有四居室呢,等到自己住到四居室,他海边还有别墅呢。这个心里很不平衡,要攀比呀,所以他就要奋斗啊,奋斗。因为这些别墅哪,包括那些名牌汽车,是他身份、价值的体现哪。自己当个处长的时候,他觉得还有部长的位置,当了部长还想当总统呢,当了总统还有联合国秘书长的岗位呢,尝尝那味道也不错呢。如果到这个位置,还有转轮圣王呢,还有天上的神仙更自在呢。所以,这一切,是欲壑难填啦!

我们这求不得苦,最好的解决方法,就是知足。一个知足者虽然住在茅棚都像天堂,一个不知足的人住在天堂都像住在茅棚。怎么样才能知足?就是少欲,少欲才能知足,知足才能常乐,这是古圣先贤告诉我们的一个幸福药方啊。

你不能在外部世界寻找一个幸福的满足,实际上他追求外部的一种东西,是没有根本解决人生价值问题。他认为官位当得越高越大,财富越来越多,著作写得越多,就是他自我价值的表现。当你把外部的一切东西,作为自我价值表现的时候,他就永远处在不安宁的状态。所以,人要向内心寻找满足,寻找自我价值的肯定。向内寻求,在现代这种市场经济社会,自工业化以来,他有一个很麻烦的现象,就是市场经济引发人的贪欲之心,因为企业化的运作就是追求利润的最大化。在这种市场经济时代,评价人的价值就是功利主义的,看你赚没赚到钱,笑贫不笑娼啊。古代的道德标准、审美标准在这个时代是黯然失色,还有宗教的价值。我们每天在这种求不得苦当中,备受煎熬啊。

对于这个,学佛的人,一定要透过这一关,不需要求啊。不需要求并不是说我们不要去积极努力地工作,不是这个意思。在我们心里,一定要有把这个世间看成梦幻泡影的智慧,要有一种出世胸怀,所谓以出世的精神从事入世的事业,宠辱不惊,只要尽到了自己的一份努力,结果怎么样啊,不要过于执著。但问耕耘,不问收获。因为你命中有没有这个东西,跟你宿世有没有修德是有关系的。命中没有的,你虽求不能得啊,如果你命中有的,却之也不可免哪,你想不要也是不可以的。

人有一种命在里面哪,当然这个命是可以转化的,所以叫命运嘛。因为我们现在的,一个人的主观能动性,人的行为的种种选择,能够对原来的命产生一定的影响。当然,如果你的改变力量不是很大的话,你的这个命的轨迹,它还是循着原来的轨迹走。一定是你现在修善的业力很大,善力很大,或者你造恶的力量很大,它就使这个命的轨迹偏移了。所以,这个命是有的。就是现代的分子生物学,遗传基因学,也在反映这个问题。

奥地利物理学家薛定谔1944年出版了一本名为《生命是什么》的小册子,作者在书中明确地提出了DNA可能是生命信息编码的载体,这一思想极大地影响和鼓舞了当时的年轻科学家。1953年,沃森和克里克共同提出了DNA 分子的双螺旋结构,标志着生物科学的发展进入了分子生物学阶段。在DNA的双螺旋分子结构当中,就把你这个人的一生的信息都编码好了,于是,你未来的一生的行为就是对这个遗传密码译码的过程。所以生命是有定数的,薛定鄂在写这个《生命是什么》的时候,也谈到生命不是一张白纸,它是带着一个蓝本来到这个世间的,然而离开这个世间,这一世的业力又在这个遗传密码当中,又加进了信息程序。

我们带着一个新的蓝本再来到这个世间,于是我们世间的这种寿命的长短、健康与否、福报多大、官位多大,这些都有它的原来的遗传密码在起作用。所以了解这些东西,就是我们众生虚幻的业力当中产生的梦幻之相。把它看空,是好是坏,反正都是虚幻的,都是在做梦。然而尽管在做梦,我们尽量在做一个好梦而已,但你就是好梦也是梦,所以一定在心理当中把这种求不得苦,加以化解。

现在很多人过于执著这个,生活得太痛苦了,天天去比较啊。哎呀,原来没有电视看,现在我有一个十四寸的彩电,然而人家有二十四寸的彩电,你心里很不平衡,一天到晚去比较啊。如果我们要比较,就一定要全方位地比较。当我们骑着毛驴的时候,看着别人骑着马,固然是很不平衡,为什么他骑高头大马,但是你也要回头看一看哪,回头还有推车的人哪。
满头大汗推车的人,很是辛苦,我这里满头大汗推车,步行着还要推这些重物,看到前面还有骑着毛驴的,他也很不平衡,但他可以回头看一看哪,还有一个残疾拐腿的人在后面拄着拐杖呢,这时候他应该想一想我还能够六根完备啊,心里要平衡哪。有时候我们的幸福感,往往是当失去的时候我们感觉到,哎呀,没有珍惜呀!这段时间我们身体比较好了,我们不会珍惜它,觉得很正常,一旦有一天病下来,比如,我上个月忽然一下子腰闪了,连腰都弯不起来了,才感觉到腰能弯下来、屈伸,这是一种幸福啊!当你起都不能起身,动一下就疼得龇牙咧嘴的时候,当你失去的时候,就会觉得这里面实在是太痛苦了。

所以我们每天都要感恩啊,感恩上苍啊,天地君亲师,感恩佛菩萨对我们的加持,让我们还能够活得没有多大的痛苦。

The primordial ground, the great, ever-pure primordial emptiness, which is free from all elaboration and change, is the very nature of uncompounded and self-arising awareness: Bless me so that I may recognise the view, my very own nature.

-- Trulshik Rinpoche, Ngawang Chokyi Lodro

Sunday, 2 September 2018

The Case for Rebirth

by Guy Armstrong

What happens when we die? This question has vexed us humans for as long as we’ve been able to conceive of a future. Opinions abound. The materialist believes nothing happens; everything simply ends. The eternalist believes we will all have everlasting existence in either eternal joy or misery. The agnostic says we can’t know, so it’s not worth thinking about. Some Buddhists believe we will be reborn, and that the circumstances of one’s rebirth are influenced by past actions. These stances are often strongly held even though, if pressed, those who hold them will admit they don’t actually know.

In Rebirth in Early Buddhism and Current Research, Bhikkhu Analayo, author of the highly regarded book Satipatthana: The Direct Path to Realisation, approaches this question from multiple perspectives, examining the tenet of rebirth through early discourses of the Buddha, historical debates, accounts of near-death experiences, and modern research. Although Analayo is a deeply committed practitioner and scholar in the tradition of early Buddhism, this is no polemical tract. He writes early on that, while he is sympathetic to the idea of rebirth, “for me personally rebirth is not a crucial issue.”

Analayo’s goal is not to persuade but rather to understand “things as they really are.” As such, he writes in the balanced, dispassionate style of an academic who expects to be challenged on any statement not supported by facts. Yet Analayo does not shy away from controversy, taking up an array of viewpoints on the issue and thoughtfully considering each. This alone makes the book a refreshing approach to a topic often muddied by polarising opinions.

REBIRTH IN THE BUDDHA'S TEACHINGS 

In Buddhist countries such as Sri Lanka, Burma, and Thailand, the idea of rebirth is almost universally accepted. But in the West, practitioners are more apt to question tradition and approach foundational teachings with scepticism. Today many Buddhist teachers deny that the Buddha even taught rebirth, arguing that the numerous references to the concept in the early discourses were a later addition. Others claim the Buddha taught rebirth only to conform to the pervasive cultural belief of his day. Analayo begins his investigation by examining these ideas in light of the Buddha’s teachings on rebirth as found in the Pali Nikayas and Chinese Agamas, his source books for early Buddhism. In so doing, he contends that teachings on rebirth are integrated so fully into the early discourses that they could not have been interpolated later. The Buddha spoke of his recollection of past lives not as a speculative theory but as a truth he realised on the night of his awakening and as an insight available to anyone who trains in the required meditative discipline.

Analayo begins by analysing the role of rebirth in the chain of causal links of dependent arising (paticca samupada), which describes in detail the genesis of suffering. He focuses especially on the link between consciousness and name-and-form. Here “consciousness” refers to the mind’s capacity to have any experience at all, while “name” is the mental capacity for naming elements of sense experience, and “form” refers to the physical body. In one discourse the Buddha asks Ananda, “If consciousness did not enter the mother’s womb, would there be name-and-form?” And Ananda replies, “No.” In other words, the Buddha taught that consciousness, continuing from the previous life, meets with a newly forming embryo in order to make possible the body (form) and cognitive process (name) of the new being.

In the materialist view, a rebirth doctrine would imply a mind-body dualism, which would be unacceptable. As Analayo shows, however, the Buddha’s understanding of the mind-body relationship is more nuanced than either a strictly unitary or strictly dualistic view would permit. The Buddha spoke of the mutual dependency between consciousness and name-and-form, comparing them to two sheaves of reeds leaning against one another. Consciousness, a fundamental aspect of mind, may be somewhat separate from body, but the cognitive process (name) is so closely tied to the body (form) as to be described as just one factor. The Tibetan Wheel of Life painting illustrates this link as two people sharing one boat.

In examining the relationship between consciousness and name-and-form, Analayo in effect refutes the materialist view, widely held in the West, which asserts that mind is simply a byproduct of the functioning of the body that ends completely at death. This belief was also common at the time of the Buddha, who in a list of wrong views in the Brahmajala Suttacalled it “annihilationist.” The fact that the Buddha felt compelled to address the annihilationist view refutes the notion that rebirth was universally accepted in ancient India.

Analayo also rejects the assertion that teachings on rebirth were merely acquiescence to a popular cultural belief of the time, pointing out that it was so central to the Buddha’s message that it was part of the standard formula for right view, the first factor of the eightfold path. The Buddha told his disciples that he taught only what he considered essential to awakening: a “handful of leaves” rather than the entire forest he had come to know. If the concept of rebirth were not essential in some way, why would it have been such a prominent part of that handful? Analayo points to its centrality in the Buddha’s description of samsara, the endless cycle of birth and death, with all its attendant suffering. This has provided a compelling motivation for generations of practitioners to dedicate themselves to the goal of full awakening.

CHILDREN WHO REMEMBER PAST LIVES 

A particularly intriguing section of the book details numerous stories of young children who recounted what they described as memories of previous lives. Such recollections often include precise, verifiable details the children could have no possible way of knowing. Researchers, including Dr. Ian Stevenson at the University of Virginia, have collected thousands of accounts and, when possible, investigated them to assess their accuracy.

A three-year-old boy in Lebanon recalled having been killed in battle in his former life. He accurately reported how much money the person he had been had in his pockets at the time of his death and identified various personal articles when taken to that person’s home. A two-year-old boy in Turkey claimed he had frozen to death after an airplane crash in his previous life. The person’s family believed the man had died instantly in the crash, but when consulted, a Turkish Airlines official confirmed the man had indeed died from freezing. A two-year-old girl in Thailand remembered living in a monastery in her previous life. When taken there, she knew her way around, recognised a number of monastics, and even detailed what had changed about the buildings in the time since she had lived there. In many such cases, the location of a birthmark on the child’s body is said to correlate with an injury sustained at the time of death in a prior life.

Analayo concludes that “fraud as an explanation for all of them can be safely discarded,” adding that “the body of evidence collected … offers considerable support for the assumption that at least some of these cases do reflect genuine memories of the past.” A proponent of rebirth might even argue that these stories represent more evidence than materialists have been able to gather in support of their view.

DHAMMARUWAN 

The most compelling of the children’s stories is that of Dhammaruwan, a Sri Lankan boy born in 1968. At the age of two, he spontaneously began to sit in meditation and chant for long stretches of time. Eventually someone realised he was chanting Buddhist discourses in Pali, but in a melody and meter more akin to devotional kirtan than to the monotone cadences favoured today. The boy explained he had learned the chants in a previous life in India when he served as a reciter monk, one who memorises sections of the Pali Canon. He said he studied under the renowned monk Buddhaghosa in the fifth century and moved with him to Sri Lanka, where the elder carried out his work of compiling and translating many commentaries, including the Visuddhimagga.

Dhammaruwan’s chants were recorded and circulated, making him famous in Sri Lanka, uncomfortably so for a shy child. By adulthood he had lost the memories of the chants but was still able to recall his impressions of Buddhaghosa, whom he described as a scholar but not a meditator. While the fifth century may be too distant to verify Dhammaruwan’s recollections, Analayo goes to great lengths to analyse the chants themselves to determine whether the child could have learned them by overhearing them in this life. The book includes an exhaustive comparison of the discourses chanted by the child with four different editions of the Pali texts (from Sri Lanka, Burma, Thailand, and London), establishing that Dhammaruwan’s versions of the texts are not found in any modern source. Therefore, Analyo concludes, the boy had no way of learning them in his current lifetime.
Dhammaruwan is now living as a monk in Sri Lanka under the name Samadhikusala. He was ordained by Bhante Gunaratana, whose foreword provides a lovely introduction to the child and the man. Two old recordings of his chants are available for streaming on Wisdom Publications’ website at www.wisdompubs.org/rebirth-early-buddhism.

Buddhism has gained a foothold in the West amid a set of cultural assumptions strongly influenced by both science and Christianity, so it is only natural that the notion of rebirth would not immediately resonate for many practitioners. Yet the doctrine is such an integral part of the Buddha’s teachings that, in the spirit of open-minded inquiry that is a hallmark of the scientific approach, it deserves serious consideration. The rational presentation in Bhikkhu Anālayo’s book is well-suited to this task.

Bodhichitta is the essential path to be taken into practice. The main cause of achieving bodhichitta is great compassion -- the unbearable feeling of compassion for all sentient beings!.... What is more beneficial than to practice love and compassion, to practice bodhichitta!

-- Ribur Rinpoche

Saturday, 1 September 2018

不管对什么样的众生都一定要广结善缘

達真堪布

佛祖释迦牟尼佛第一次转法轮的时候,来了八万天子。这是佛在因地时跟他们结的缘。有一世,佛转生为一只雪蛙,慈悲心具足,但被一个残忍的猎人捉住,扒了皮。雪蛙疼痛难忍,在河边休息,这时被一只蚂蚁发现,然后叫来蚁穴中的八万蚂蚁来咬食它的肉。

雪蛙不但没有生起嗔恨心,反而发愿:“愿以此功德,使沉溺在轮回中的众生,未得度者速得度,未安乐者得安乐,未解脱者得解脱,未涅盘者速涅盘。以此善根,愿我能够圆满如来正等觉人天导师的果位。现在我以己血肉满足它们,愿将来能以无上妙法满足它们,令彼皆证圣果。”然后死去。

后来佛第一次转法轮,最初利益和救度的就是这些众生。我们现在在因地,也要这样广结善缘,多种善根,将来就能有缘度化这些众生。

我们也经常讲,要处处种善根、结善缘。这个很重要。等我们成佛的时候,他们会成为我们的眷属,我们能度化他们。默默地发愿很重要。我们现在已经发菩提心、行菩萨道了,我们现在也是在因地,要多种善根、结善缘。若是不结善缘也不结恶缘,将来只能成为独觉佛,不能成为无上正等觉之佛,因为没有眷属,到时候自己一个人,多孤独啊!

现在很多法师、善知识在讲经说法,利益众生,有的有很多眷属和弟子,有的却没有。这也与自己的愿力有关系。

我们也要处处发愿,看见他人种善根了,我们随喜。若是他人先成佛了,愿我能成为他的第一个眷属;若是我成佛了,愿他能成为我的第一个眷属。看见别人造业了,我们也发愿,愿他能远离这种恶缘,将来我成佛的时候,他能成为我的第一批眷属,能度化他们。

我们不管是给父母,给儿女,还是给其他众生一些东西,也可以这样发愿:愿以此功德,将来能以无上妙法满足他们的愿望,让他们证得佛果。

在生活的点点滴滴当中,发善愿,种善根,结善缘,做善事,行善法,这就是修行。

常结善缘是成就的方法

对每个众生都要结善缘,不要结恶缘。善缘、恶缘都在自己的心,我们一定要时时观察自己的心,对每个众生都要有一颗好心、一个好愿。这个特别重要!

佛和佛不一样,有的佛眷属特别多,成就的人也特别多,因为他们在因地的时候,在修行的过程中,跟很多很多众生结了善缘。我们都是修大乘佛法的人,我们学佛、修行唯一的目的就是度化众生。如果我们现在在因地的时候,不跟众生结善缘,甚至还结恶缘的话,以后我们成佛了也无法救度他们。众生都有烦恼,都有痛苦,根源是什么?根源就是无明、我执。只有你成佛了以后,给他讲经说法,才能让他了解断除无明我执的方法。你现在已经跟他结上善缘了,所以那时候他能听你的话,能对你有信心,按你的要求去做。如果因地时善缘结得少,将来成佛转法轮的时候,他们不能成为你的眷属和弟子,他们也不能跟你学、跟你修,你也救度不了他们。

我们现在对每个众生都不能结恶缘,一定要结善缘,多多地结善缘。一定要发好心、好愿。送给他东西的时候你就发愿:愿他也能学佛、也能修成,愿我成佛的时候第一个能度他,愿我成佛的时候他能成为我的眷属、弟子,让他学佛修行,让他解脱。你接受别人的东西的时候,这也是一种缘,你也要发愿:愿我以后成佛的时候,他能成为我的眷属,我的好弟子,让他学佛修行,他也能成就,也能成佛。无论什么时候都要结善缘。

现在我们周围有很多人不学佛修行还诽谤佛法,劝也劝不动。这个时候我们不能恨他们,不能怨他们,一定要可怜他们、慈悲他们,发好心好愿:愿我将来成佛的时候,第一个度他们。你看那些众生那么颠倒、痛苦,现在我们无法救度他,无法帮助他,怎么办?我们从心里默默地发愿:愿在他们的相续中也能够早日生起出离心、菩提心,能够早日证悟大圆满法的境界;我成就了、成佛了,第一个度化他。只要默默地发愿、发心,这样就结善缘了。多多地结善缘,等你成就了,你就能度化很多很多众生。现在你不发愿,成佛的时候也没有眷属,自己的净土中只有一个人,多孤独啊!

一定要把心放平、放正,我们应该跟每个众生都结个善缘。我们对所有看到的、听到的、想到的众生,都不能有贪嗔痴,不能嫉妒、傲慢、烦恼、分别,一定要发一个好心。这都是修行啊!结善缘肯定能得到善报,他们生生世世都会成为我们的好朋友,都会帮助我们,不会伤害我们。如果我们跟他们结恶缘了,那我们肯定要感受恶报。现在有的人对我们不好,诽谤我们、伤害我们、欺骗我们,这就是因为我们以前跟他们结恶缘的缘故。现在恶缘的果报成熟了,我们应该欢欢喜喜地承担,应该高高兴兴地还债。不能怨恨他们,否则又结上恶缘了,以后还要感受恶报。这就是轮回啊!

常结善缘,这就是成就的方法,只有这么做才能解脱、才能成佛。不管什么时候,不管在什么样的情况下,不管对什么样的众生都一定要结善缘,不能结恶缘。凡夫结恶缘特别容易,结善缘特别难,我们都一定要注意,一定要努力!

I bow at the feet of the masters who carefully distinguish, "All imagined and dependent phenomena are nonexistence but the fully established true nature is never nonexistence," teaching what transcends existence and nonexistence, and eternalism and nihilism.

-- Dolpopa Sherab Gyaltsen